From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B5D6C05027 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 18:03:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=BGc7iDwvXmQeyE3OSphT3+e9q6XfIL5cQ9uM9jp5sXA=; b=2Njq632Whx25MT 9s407P2TiOIDjFMzdb7laGjl7/bww3TpEkvrxrmBsII4TackajpYaMsge6+9pzwrevybDJMLZ1HJz M5QUi6HvLnHCKRe/KsxzOjkz6rB9CIvE/1EsbMUSQIC25TlfhZWUTR97tga51LXyLDklN4TfJHXLb 9Bb2HcJbdN2T1nHC5qZkpBt71nE1WyudX5ZpuI07KkkilfuWstGNMppBflmAj0TPoal9Q0wormafr djSUPeC223/d14YeVLAY1xGofVvzN/HoTnemWjFLOiHQVcQmEJpJ72ni+uy+XihHiM5vjwKt2zJRi CtNUYAqSnyB8TXiWTCLA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pNduf-00Gtan-OC; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 18:02:21 +0000 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([2600:3c01:e000:3a1::42]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pNduc-00GtYf-Lp; Thu, 02 Feb 2023 18:02:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:281:8300:73::5f6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D4A87DE; Thu, 2 Feb 2023 18:02:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 3D4A87DE DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1675360932; bh=foQ1/0HwCNQSpMC2ZhJON6OX1wyhGGFLINaHnphz3mQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=kJbd0F2rWnluPzLgK38TMaqiIycpVlQWVPBxv1Ywm6Iy3i8ABcGXnwWj/VtHUyGXu TJJDRYuZiiaPKwc7O/ldvE1/aerbMkVu42adh0LD4ub4MR18FloBX9uSDPEm/6+Agm 4CWfaYGafUqqIdFHDLbr6eoeEzoJgvPmzb0HDwH9BL2cT0Nw0KuPLf9keCwHw5k/SH DDj2GgsZ1o+/r9V1mFT7GBBjv2K67z03FoEz1UY7/izsPxHSjeVTQ0hzLNMGWk0Emq c1fXgOxS4gRZZHoFkTBh9Yd31cXHfl4F1fb8qR74Xrl7qTrj5amsNpULEy135z99CY y7R01tI/HjX/Q== From: Jonathan Corbet To: Kuan-Ying Lee , Matthias Brugger Cc: chinwen.chang@mediatek.com, andrew.yang@mediatek.com, Kuan-Ying Lee , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/doc: Replace isolate_lru_page with folio_isolate_lru In-Reply-To: <20230131062853.28449-1-Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com> References: <20230131062853.28449-1-Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com> Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 11:02:11 -0700 Message-ID: <87a61wvtcs.fsf@meer.lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230202_100218_737270_8C6E3303 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.35 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Kuan-Ying Lee writes: > Since we introduce folio, replace isolate_lru_page() with > folio_isolate_lru(). > > Signed-off-by: Kuan-Ying Lee > --- > Documentation/mm/page_migration.rst | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) This seems like a good patch to copy to linux-mm - done now. The patch perhaps is a closer match to what's in linux-next, but it seems that, if we're going to update this document, we should reflect the use folios throughout? Thanks, jon > diff --git a/Documentation/mm/page_migration.rst b/Documentation/mm/page_migration.rst > index 11493bad7112..1f8cc175d770 100644 > --- a/Documentation/mm/page_migration.rst > +++ b/Documentation/mm/page_migration.rst > @@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ In kernel use of migrate_pages() > > Lists of pages to be migrated are generated by scanning over > pages and moving them into lists. This is done by > - calling isolate_lru_page(). > - Calling isolate_lru_page() increases the references to the page > + calling folio_isolate_lru(). > + Calling folio_isolate_lru() increases the references to the page > so that it cannot vanish while the page migration occurs. > It also prevents the swapper or other scans from encountering > the page. > @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ How migrate_pages() works > > migrate_pages() does several passes over its list of pages. A page is moved > if all references to a page are removable at the time. The page has > -already been removed from the LRU via isolate_lru_page() and the refcount > +already been removed from the LRU via folio_isolate_lru() and the refcount > is increased so that the page cannot be freed while page migration occurs. > > Steps: > -- > 2.18.0 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel