From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB72CC63697 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68AA5206B2 for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="aK5+YLz6"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="1D4tJXE6" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 68AA5206B2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From: Message-ID:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=VF/1NrYTCY+nfrcwUmsbhuKn5YliPawQR09c+sseMlM=; b=aK5+YLz6PAa/kbd/AD57EaXhX zDrd2FxiYkcpeBHQ3/MoAX+T7HfqC0yb4dljmfDvnOtvtKSPkN8/WCpkD046D90GP8elIqcOBevE3 6JEaKMOy5aMGLae+OK49gJNPil1yIjvw6IkZKevf3QzvFdtccU2c7Lpy85L2HLMoOcyZYVfZOtpp1 ok3ZOdQ2UrlAbYbHWx5w2ieFR64Vygn0LBOJc7w6yY6+nokxfN+jMucbq39l4ZR14Zx877W9oW+kb GEn10N+fxP3paVXfC6HwPa9ayLqpcHalh1BTZvjb16KYrggEf8e9CXedCJxm0/6q7V/9Ej5vp+O4/ DJ8vqSDCQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1khG97-0007aa-26; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:01:01 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1khG91-0007Xw-76 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:00:56 +0000 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC15D20758; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:00:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1606154453; bh=OgBMsLtKiZ+xCEA9AnmfuQ94yiu816Qd03DhHewUrCs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=1D4tJXE6sEFGBsF8kVA3HlliXj3KgnEXEawHA6/WRHrqSQcRMITUw7OZbH6sCVLfD rPiVP6tdn5sbUDLgeIOOfi70Z5rLKo3c1dkasSbpR8jRYbTy62yE6c6gY0vD/ubEjm kRsCwfswlmyX19Ebx9RlhZ7tPtXJYGh6CZ+sgZ1g= Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=wait-a-minute.misterjones.org) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1khG8x-00D1ci-Hq; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:00:51 +0000 Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:00:50 +0000 Message-ID: <87a6v854x9.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Marc Zyngier To: David Brazdil Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/24] kvm: arm64: Add SMC handler in nVHE EL2 In-Reply-To: <20201116204318.63987-9-dbrazdil@google.com> References: <20201116204318.63987-1-dbrazdil@google.com> <20201116204318.63987-9-dbrazdil@google.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 Emacs/27.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: dbrazdil@google.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, dennis@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, cl@linux.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, qperret@google.com, ascull@google.com, qwandor@google.com, kernel-team@android.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201123_130055_453981_034F9966 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 27.31 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , kernel-team@android.com, Lorenzo Pieralisi , Andrew Walbran , Suzuki K Poulose , Catalin Marinas , Quentin Perret , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morse , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Tejun Heo , Dennis Zhou , Christoph Lameter , Will Deacon , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Julien Thierry , Andrew Scull Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:43:02 +0000, David Brazdil wrote: > > Add handler of host SMCs in KVM nVHE trap handler. Forward all SMCs to > EL3 and propagate the result back to EL1. This is done in preparation > for validating host SMCs in KVM nVHE protected mode. > > The implementation assumes that firmware uses SMCCC v1.2 or older. That > means x0-x17 can be used both for arguments and results, other GPRs are > preserved. > > Signed-off-by: David Brazdil > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/host.S | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/host.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/host.S > index ed27f06a31ba..52dae5cd5a28 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/host.S > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/host.S > @@ -183,3 +183,41 @@ SYM_CODE_START(__kvm_hyp_host_vector) > invalid_host_el1_vect // FIQ 32-bit EL1 > invalid_host_el1_vect // Error 32-bit EL1 > SYM_CODE_END(__kvm_hyp_host_vector) > + > +/* > + * Forward SMC with arguments in struct kvm_cpu_context, and > + * store the result into the same struct. Assumes SMCCC 1.2 or older. > + * > + * x0: struct kvm_cpu_context* > + */ > +SYM_CODE_START(__kvm_hyp_host_forward_smc) > + /* > + * Use x18 to keep a pointer to the host context because x18 > + * is callee-saved SMCCC but not in AAPCS64. > + */ > + mov x18, x0 > + > + ldp x0, x1, [x18, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(0)] > + ldp x2, x3, [x18, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(2)] > + ldp x4, x5, [x18, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(4)] > + ldp x6, x7, [x18, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(6)] > + ldp x8, x9, [x18, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(8)] > + ldp x10, x11, [x18, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(10)] > + ldp x12, x13, [x18, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(12)] > + ldp x14, x15, [x18, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(14)] > + ldp x16, x17, [x18, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(16)] > + > + smc #0 > + > + stp x0, x1, [x18, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(0)] > + stp x2, x3, [x18, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(2)] > + stp x4, x5, [x18, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(4)] > + stp x6, x7, [x18, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(6)] > + stp x8, x9, [x18, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(8)] > + stp x10, x11, [x18, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(10)] > + stp x12, x13, [x18, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(12)] > + stp x14, x15, [x18, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(14)] > + stp x16, x17, [x18, #CPU_XREG_OFFSET(16)] This is going to be really good for CPUs that need to use ARCH_WA1 for their Spectre-v2 mitigation... :-( If that's too expensive, we may have to reduce the number of save/restored registers, but I'm worried the battle is already lost by the time we reach this (the host trap path is already a huge hammer). Eventually, we'll have to insert the mitigation in the vectors anyway, just like we have on the guest exit path. Boo. Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel