From: khilman@linaro.org (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: omap5: build opp4xxx_data.c
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 13:56:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a9mducye.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51C9FC97.1020502@ti.com> (Santosh Shilimkar's message of "Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:24:55 -0400")
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> writes:
> On Tuesday 25 June 2013 04:17 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Santosh Shilimkar
>> <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Well having voltage data in voltage domain was not my decision ;-)
>>> Instead of creating another set of dummy data, I just used what
>>> is out there(OMAP4) with clear comment that data needs to be updated.
>>> I don't see any problem in this considering we have devices booting
>>> and working nicely for OMAP5
>> I really wish the OMAP5 devices(the latest ones from Fab) I have would
>> like to function at OMAP4 configurations! Unfortunately the devices
>> tend to follow the data manual for OMAP5.
>> *if* there is no need for it to boot, I suggest removing it.
>>
> I don't understand you. For OMAP5, that data without voltage
> controller support doesn't do anything bad. Since there was some
> dependency of voltage domain association whit PD's, I have to keep
> that. I never claimed that OMAP4 settings would work for OMAP5
> in absolute terms.
>
> Feel free to post a patch with right data which you seems to have.
> I don't mind you removing that data as long as the device
> continues to boot. Patch welcome.
Thanks to Rajendra's cleanup, I don't think we need dummy data anymore:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=137147503827947&w=2
That series is queued for v3.11.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-25 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-21 20:29 [PATCH] ARM: omap5: build opp4xxx_data.c Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-21 20:42 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-06-25 19:20 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-06-25 19:55 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-25 19:57 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-06-25 20:12 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-25 20:17 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-06-25 20:24 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-25 20:56 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2013-06-25 20:59 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-25 22:36 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-06-25 22:43 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-06-25 23:02 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-06-25 23:27 ` Santosh Shilimkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a9mducye.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).