From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: rafael@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
"moderated list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support"
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] powercap: idle_inject: Create threads on demand
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 01:21:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bj7wtdyn.ffs@fw13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105105805.a6d1b38585290ab73597aa6b@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, Nov 05 2026 at 10:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2026 19:46:13 +0100 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@oss.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11/3/26 00:09, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> > Idle injection currently registers per-CPU kernel threads during early
>> > initialization, including on CPUs for which no idle injection device
>> > will be registered.
>> >
>> > This series makes thread creation follow the lifetime and CPU mask of
>> > each idle injection device.
>> >
>> > The first patch adds an optional CPU mask to smpboot thread descriptors.
>> > The mask restricts thread creation, CPU hotplug handling and teardown,
>> > while preserving the existing behavior for descriptors without a mask.
>> >
>> > The second patch uses this support to register idle injection threads
>> > when a device registers and destroy them when it unregisters. CPU
>> > ownership claims, registration rollback and thread teardown are
>> > serialized to prevent overlapping registrations from sharing threads.
>> >
>> > Validation includes W=1 builds of the affected objects, whitespace
>> > checks and static review of the teardown locking paths. Concurrent
>> > registration and CPU hotplug runtime testing remains outstanding.
>> >
>> > The series was tested on Rockchip RK3588.
>>
>> One thing not specified in this cover is which tree these changes have
>> to go through ?
>
> I'd volunteer Rafael's, after peterz/tglx review.
>
> Please! Removing one kernel thread per cpu makes the world a better
> place.
I'll look at it in the next days with brain awake...
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-02 23:09 [PATCH 0/2] powercap: idle_inject: Create threads on demand Daniel Lezcano
2026-11-02 23:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] smpboot: Allow restricting per-CPU threads to a CPU mask Daniel Lezcano
2026-11-03 11:48 ` Bradley Morgan
2026-11-02 23:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] powercap: idle_inject: Create per-CPU threads on registration Daniel Lezcano
2026-11-05 18:46 ` [PATCH 0/2] powercap: idle_inject: Create threads on demand Daniel Lezcano
2026-11-05 18:58 ` Andrew Morton
2026-11-11 0:21 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bj7wtdyn.ffs@fw13 \
--to=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox