From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Alexey Charkov <alchark@flipper.net>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@rock-chips.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] nvmem: rockchip-otp: Serialize reads
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 10:06:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bjae7o9b.fsf@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKTNdwF_wY8JSoQs=auK_9YNGT+hwQ=dAhcRVsf1E1CVvFs-XA@mail.gmail.com> (Alexey Charkov's message of "Wed, 2 Sep 2026 16:40:16 +0400")
Hi Alexey,
>> I haven't seen Sashiko's answer but isn't the goal of guards to just be
>> released whatever the actual return path?
>
> I believe it's based on the guidance in [1]. In this particular case,
> gotos don't jump outside the scope where I put the guard, so the
> scope-based guard is still correct. However, stylistically, it is
> indeed uncommon to see scope-based guards in functions using gotos.
> Explicit lock/unlock is easy in this case, anyway.
>
> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.2.2/source/include/linux/cleanup.h#L148-L153
I never read that paragraph before, but okay, makes sense.
Thanks,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-03 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 15:33 [PATCH 0/4] nvmem: Derive Rockchip MAC addresses from the OTP CPU ID Alexey Charkov
2026-09-01 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/4] nvmem: rockchip-otp: Serialize reads Alexey Charkov
2026-09-02 9:10 ` Miquel Raynal
2026-09-02 9:24 ` Alexey Charkov
2026-09-02 10:17 ` Miquel Raynal
2026-09-02 12:40 ` Alexey Charkov
2026-09-03 8:06 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2026-09-01 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: nvmem: layouts: Add Rockchip OTP CPUID layout Alexey Charkov
2026-09-01 15:33 ` [PATCH 3/4] nvmem: layouts: Add Rockchip OTP CPUID layout driver Alexey Charkov
2026-09-02 9:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2026-09-01 15:33 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: Derive GMAC MAC addresses from OTP on RK3576 Alexey Charkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bjae7o9b.fsf@bootlin.com \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=alchark@flipper.net \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=finley.xiao@rock-chips.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=srini@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox