From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <Alexandru.Elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: arm64: Raise KVM's reported debug architecture to v8.2
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2021 10:21:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bl349nx8.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ_QshjMXMFK2uHVDxYbFkVJApGxhT4M4NbMNY+qX3QvPe5_A@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 19:18:13 +0100,
Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> wrote:
>
> Hey Marc,
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 4:31 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 01:32:02 +0100,
> > Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com> wrote:
> [...]
> > > case SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1:
> > > - /* Limit debug to ARMv8.0 */
> > > + /* Limit debug to ARMv8.2 */
> > > val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_DEBUGVER);
> > > - val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_DEBUGVER), 6);
> > > + val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_DEBUGVER), 8);
> > > +
> > > + /* Hide DoubleLock from guests */
> > > + val &= ~ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_DOUBLELOCK);
> > > + val |= FIELD_PREP(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_DOUBLELOCK), 0CF);
> > > +
> >
> > One issue with that is that this will break migration from an older
> > kernel (DFR0 will be different between source and destination).
> >
> > You'll need a set_user handler and deal with it in a similar way to
> > CSV2/CSV3.
>
> Yeah, definitely so. In that case, unless we're strongly motivated to
> expose these changes soon, I'll just punt the ID register changes
> until Reiji's series [1] lands, as anything I add for a writable DFR0
> will invariably be scrapped in favor of his work.
Yeah, I think that's a sensible thing to do. I need to find the
bandwidth to look into these patches...
> I'll post v2 of this series folding in your feedback (thx for quick
> review, btw), less this patch.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-01 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-29 0:31 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: arm64: Fixes for the exposed debug architecture Oliver Upton
2021-10-29 0:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Stash OSLSR_EL1 in the cpu context Oliver Upton
2021-10-29 11:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-29 0:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: Allow the guest to change the OS Lock status Oliver Upton
2021-10-29 11:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-29 0:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: arm64: Raise KVM's reported debug architecture to v8.2 Oliver Upton
2021-10-29 11:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-29 18:18 ` Oliver Upton
2021-11-01 10:21 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bl349nx8.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=Alexandru.Elisei@arm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).