From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: eric@anholt.net (Eric Anholt) Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2016 12:55:15 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v2 4/9] arm64: Add platform selection for BCM2835. In-Reply-To: <20160603112721.GC1128@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1464934708-24769-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <1464934708-24769-5-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <20160603112721.GC1128@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: <87bn3gu3to.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Catalin Marinas writes: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 08:18:23AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms >> index 7ef1d05..ea88402 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms >> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms >> @@ -13,6 +13,19 @@ config ARCH_ALPINE >> This enables support for the Annapurna Labs Alpine >> Soc family. >> >> +config ARCH_BCM2835 >> + bool "Broadcom BCM2835 family" >> + select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB >> + select CLKSRC_OF >> + select PINCTRL >> + select PINCTRL_BCM2835 >> + select ARM_AMBA >> + select ARM_TIMER_SP804 >> + select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER >> + help >> + This enables support for the Broadcom BCM2837 SoC. >> + This SoC is used in the Raspberry Pi 3 device. > > I thought we would just use ARCH_BCM, or is it too generic? Consensus last time around seemed to be to drop adding ARCH_BCM, in favor of patch 1 of the series. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 818 bytes Desc: not available URL: