* [PATCH] ARM: imx: clk-imx6sl: Suppress duplicate const sparse warning
@ 2014-01-15 6:19 Liu Ying
2014-01-15 6:58 ` Shawn Guo
2014-01-15 11:27 ` Shawn Guo
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Liu Ying @ 2014-01-15 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
There should be no duplicate const specifiers for those static
constant character string arrays defined for clock mux options.
Also, the arrays are only taken as the 5th argument for the
imx_clk_mux() function, which is in the type of 'const char
**parents'. So, let's remove the 2nd const specifier right
after 'char'.
This patch fixes these sparse warnings:
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:21:25: warning: duplicate const
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:22:25: warning: duplicate const
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:23:25: warning: duplicate const
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:24:25: warning: duplicate const
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:25:25: warning: duplicate const
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:26:25: warning: duplicate const
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:27:25: warning: duplicate const
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:28:25: warning: duplicate const
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:29:25: warning: duplicate const
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:30:25: warning: duplicate const
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:31:25: warning: duplicate const
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:32:25: warning: duplicate const
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:33:25: warning: duplicate const
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:34:25: warning: duplicate const
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:35:25: warning: duplicate const
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:36:25: warning: duplicate const
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:37:25: warning: duplicate const
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:38:25: warning: duplicate const
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:39:25: warning: duplicate const
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:40:25: warning: duplicate const
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:41:25: warning: duplicate const
Signed-off-by: Liu Ying <Ying.Liu@freescale.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c
index c0c4ef5..9fad29a9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c
@@ -18,27 +18,27 @@
#include "clk.h"
#include "common.h"
-static const char const *step_sels[] = { "osc", "pll2_pfd2", };
-static const char const *pll1_sw_sels[] = { "pll1_sys", "step", };
-static const char const *ocram_alt_sels[] = { "pll2_pfd2", "pll3_pfd1", };
-static const char const *ocram_sels[] = { "periph", "ocram_alt_sels", };
-static const char const *pre_periph_sels[] = { "pll2_bus", "pll2_pfd2", "pll2_pfd0", "pll2_198m", };
-static const char const *periph_clk2_sels[] = { "pll3_usb_otg", "osc", "osc", "dummy", };
-static const char const *periph2_clk2_sels[] = { "pll3_usb_otg", "pll2_bus", };
-static const char const *periph_sels[] = { "pre_periph_sel", "periph_clk2_podf", };
-static const char const *periph2_sels[] = { "pre_periph2_sel", "periph2_clk2_podf", };
-static const char const *csi_lcdif_sels[] = { "mmdc", "pll2_pfd2", "pll3_120m", "pll3_pfd1", };
-static const char const *usdhc_sels[] = { "pll2_pfd2", "pll2_pfd0", };
-static const char const *ssi_sels[] = { "pll3_pfd2", "pll3_pfd3", "pll4_post_div", "dummy", };
-static const char const *perclk_sels[] = { "ipg", "osc", };
-static const char const *epdc_pxp_sels[] = { "mmdc", "pll3_usb_otg", "pll5_video_div", "pll2_pfd0", "pll2_pfd2", "pll3_pfd1", };
-static const char const *gpu2d_ovg_sels[] = { "pll3_pfd1", "pll3_usb_otg", "pll2_bus", "pll2_pfd2", };
-static const char const *gpu2d_sels[] = { "pll2_pfd2", "pll3_usb_otg", "pll3_pfd1", "pll2_bus", };
-static const char const *lcdif_pix_sels[] = { "pll2_bus", "pll3_usb_otg", "pll5_video_div", "pll2_pfd0", "pll3_pfd0", "pll3_pfd1", };
-static const char const *epdc_pix_sels[] = { "pll2_bus", "pll3_usb_otg", "pll5_video_div", "pll2_pfd0", "pll2_pfd1", "pll3_pfd1", };
-static const char const *audio_sels[] = { "pll4_post_div", "pll3_pfd2", "pll3_pfd3", "pll3_usb_otg", };
-static const char const *ecspi_sels[] = { "pll3_60m", "osc", };
-static const char const *uart_sels[] = { "pll3_80m", "osc", };
+static const char *step_sels[] = { "osc", "pll2_pfd2", };
+static const char *pll1_sw_sels[] = { "pll1_sys", "step", };
+static const char *ocram_alt_sels[] = { "pll2_pfd2", "pll3_pfd1", };
+static const char *ocram_sels[] = { "periph", "ocram_alt_sels", };
+static const char *pre_periph_sels[] = { "pll2_bus", "pll2_pfd2", "pll2_pfd0", "pll2_198m", };
+static const char *periph_clk2_sels[] = { "pll3_usb_otg", "osc", "osc", "dummy", };
+static const char *periph2_clk2_sels[] = { "pll3_usb_otg", "pll2_bus", };
+static const char *periph_sels[] = { "pre_periph_sel", "periph_clk2_podf", };
+static const char *periph2_sels[] = { "pre_periph2_sel", "periph2_clk2_podf", };
+static const char *csi_lcdif_sels[] = { "mmdc", "pll2_pfd2", "pll3_120m", "pll3_pfd1", };
+static const char *usdhc_sels[] = { "pll2_pfd2", "pll2_pfd0", };
+static const char *ssi_sels[] = { "pll3_pfd2", "pll3_pfd3", "pll4_post_div", "dummy", };
+static const char *perclk_sels[] = { "ipg", "osc", };
+static const char *epdc_pxp_sels[] = { "mmdc", "pll3_usb_otg", "pll5_video_div", "pll2_pfd0", "pll2_pfd2", "pll3_pfd1", };
+static const char *gpu2d_ovg_sels[] = { "pll3_pfd1", "pll3_usb_otg", "pll2_bus", "pll2_pfd2", };
+static const char *gpu2d_sels[] = { "pll2_pfd2", "pll3_usb_otg", "pll3_pfd1", "pll2_bus", };
+static const char *lcdif_pix_sels[] = { "pll2_bus", "pll3_usb_otg", "pll5_video_div", "pll2_pfd0", "pll3_pfd0", "pll3_pfd1", };
+static const char *epdc_pix_sels[] = { "pll2_bus", "pll3_usb_otg", "pll5_video_div", "pll2_pfd0", "pll2_pfd1", "pll3_pfd1", };
+static const char *audio_sels[] = { "pll4_post_div", "pll3_pfd2", "pll3_pfd3", "pll3_usb_otg", };
+static const char *ecspi_sels[] = { "pll3_60m", "osc", };
+static const char *uart_sels[] = { "pll3_80m", "osc", };
static struct clk_div_table clk_enet_ref_table[] = {
{ .val = 0, .div = 20, },
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [PATCH] ARM: imx: clk-imx6sl: Suppress duplicate const sparse warning
2014-01-15 6:19 [PATCH] ARM: imx: clk-imx6sl: Suppress duplicate const sparse warning Liu Ying
@ 2014-01-15 6:58 ` Shawn Guo
2014-01-15 9:21 ` Joe Perches
2014-01-16 17:06 ` Bill Pringlemeir
2014-01-15 11:27 ` Shawn Guo
1 sibling, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2014-01-15 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 02:19:34PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
> There should be no duplicate const specifiers for those static
> constant character string arrays defined for clock mux options.
> Also, the arrays are only taken as the 5th argument for the
> imx_clk_mux() function, which is in the type of 'const char
> **parents'. So, let's remove the 2nd const specifier right
> after 'char'.
>
> This patch fixes these sparse warnings:
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:21:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:22:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:23:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:24:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:25:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:26:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:27:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:28:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:29:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:30:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:31:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:32:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:33:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:34:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:35:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:36:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:37:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:38:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:39:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:40:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:41:25: warning: duplicate const
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Ying <Ying.Liu@freescale.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c
> index c0c4ef5..9fad29a9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c
> @@ -18,27 +18,27 @@
> #include "clk.h"
> #include "common.h"
>
> -static const char const *step_sels[] = { "osc", "pll2_pfd2", };
...
> +static const char *step_sels[] = { "osc", "pll2_pfd2", };
So now we're getting the following checkpatch warning:
WARNING: static const char * array should probably be static const char * const
It was added into checkpatch.pl by commit cb710ec (scripts/checkpatch.pl:
add warnings for static char that could be static const char). I'm not
sure which warning we should ignore, the sparse or the checkpatch one.
Joe, comments?
Shawn
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [PATCH] ARM: imx: clk-imx6sl: Suppress duplicate const sparse warning
2014-01-15 6:58 ` Shawn Guo
@ 2014-01-15 9:21 ` Joe Perches
2014-01-15 11:24 ` Shawn Guo
2014-01-16 17:06 ` Bill Pringlemeir
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2014-01-15 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 14:58 +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 02:19:34PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
> > There should be no duplicate const specifiers for those static
> > constant character string arrays defined for clock mux options.
> > Also, the arrays are only taken as the 5th argument for the
> > imx_clk_mux() function, which is in the type of 'const char
> > **parents'. So, let's remove the 2nd const specifier right
> > after 'char'.
> >
> > This patch fixes these sparse warnings:
> > arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:21:25: warning: duplicate const
[]
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c
[]
> > @@ -18,27 +18,27 @@
> > #include "clk.h"
> > #include "common.h"
> >
> > -static const char const *step_sels[] = { "osc", "pll2_pfd2", };
> ...
> > +static const char *step_sels[] = { "osc", "pll2_pfd2", };
>
> So now we're getting the following checkpatch warning:
>
> WARNING: static const char * array should probably be static const char * const
>
> It was added into checkpatch.pl by commit cb710ec (scripts/checkpatch.pl:
> add warnings for static char that could be static const char). I'm not
> sure which warning we should ignore, the sparse or the checkpatch one.
>
> Joe, comments?
Maybe the const **parents argument could be const * const *
That could change a lot of declarations through.
You could also ignore checkpatch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [PATCH] ARM: imx: clk-imx6sl: Suppress duplicate const sparse warning
2014-01-15 9:21 ` Joe Perches
@ 2014-01-15 11:24 ` Shawn Guo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2014-01-15 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 01:21:36AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 14:58 +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 02:19:34PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
> > > There should be no duplicate const specifiers for those static
> > > constant character string arrays defined for clock mux options.
> > > Also, the arrays are only taken as the 5th argument for the
> > > imx_clk_mux() function, which is in the type of 'const char
> > > **parents'. So, let's remove the 2nd const specifier right
> > > after 'char'.
> > >
> > > This patch fixes these sparse warnings:
> > > arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:21:25: warning: duplicate const
> []
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c
> []
> > > @@ -18,27 +18,27 @@
> > > #include "clk.h"
> > > #include "common.h"
> > >
> > > -static const char const *step_sels[] = { "osc", "pll2_pfd2", };
> > ...
> > > +static const char *step_sels[] = { "osc", "pll2_pfd2", };
> >
> > So now we're getting the following checkpatch warning:
> >
> > WARNING: static const char * array should probably be static const char * const
> >
> > It was added into checkpatch.pl by commit cb710ec (scripts/checkpatch.pl:
> > add warnings for static char that could be static const char). I'm not
> > sure which warning we should ignore, the sparse or the checkpatch one.
> >
> > Joe, comments?
>
> Maybe the const **parents argument could be const * const *
>
> That could change a lot of declarations through.
> You could also ignore checkpatch.
Okay, for now, I will ignore the checkpatch warning for this case.
Thanks, Joe.
Shawn
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ARM: imx: clk-imx6sl: Suppress duplicate const sparse warning
2014-01-15 6:58 ` Shawn Guo
2014-01-15 9:21 ` Joe Perches
@ 2014-01-16 17:06 ` Bill Pringlemeir
2014-01-16 17:28 ` Bill Pringlemeir
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Bill Pringlemeir @ 2014-01-16 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 02:19:34PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
>> There should be no duplicate const specifiers for those static
>> constant character string arrays defined for clock mux options.
>> Also, the arrays are only taken as the 5th argument for the
>> imx_clk_mux() function, which is in the type of 'const char
>> **parents'. So, let's remove the 2nd const specifier right
>> after 'char'.
>>
>> This patch fixes these sparse warnings:
>> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:21:25: warning: duplicate const
[snip]
>> Signed-off-by: Liu Ying <Ying.Liu@freescale.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c
>> index c0c4ef5..9fad29a9 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c
>>>> -18,27 +18,27 @@
>> #include "clk.h"
>> #include "common.h"
>>
>> -static const char const *step_sels[] = { "osc", "pll2_pfd2", };
> ...
>> +static const char *step_sels[] = { "osc", "pll2_pfd2", };
On 15 Jan 2014, shawn.guo at linaro.org wrote:
> So now we're getting the following checkpatch warning:
>
> WARNING: static const char * array should probably be static const char *
> const
>
> It was added into checkpatch.pl by commit cb710ec (scripts/checkpatch.pl:
> add warnings for static char that could be static const char). I'm not
> sure which warning we should ignore, the sparse or the checkpatch one.
I think both scripts/programs are right. There is a difference.
static const char const * step_sels[] = { "osc", "pll2_pfd2", }; /* dup */
static const char * const step_sels[] = { "osc", "pll2_pfd2", }; /* ok */
static char const * const step_sels[] = { "osc", "pll2_pfd2", }; /* ok */
I think that 'type const * const' is a const pointer to const data, but
'const type const *' is just a const pointer (with duplicate). The
patches have made the data non-const?
Fwiw,
Bill Pringlemeir.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [PATCH] ARM: imx: clk-imx6sl: Suppress duplicate const sparse warning
2014-01-16 17:06 ` Bill Pringlemeir
@ 2014-01-16 17:28 ` Bill Pringlemeir
2014-01-17 5:44 ` Shawn Guo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Bill Pringlemeir @ 2014-01-16 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 16 Jan 2014, bpringlemeir at nbsps.com wrote:
>> It was added into checkpatch.pl by commit cb710ec (scripts/checkpatch.pl:
>> add warnings for static char that could be static const char). I'm not
>> sure which warning we should ignore, the sparse or the checkpatch one.
> I think both scripts/programs are right. There is a difference.
> static const char const * step_sels[] = { "osc", "pll2_pfd2", }; /* dup */
> static const char * const step_sels[] = { "osc", "pll2_pfd2", }; /* ok */
> static char const * const step_sels[] = { "osc", "pll2_pfd2", }; /* ok */
> I think that 'type const * const' is a const pointer to const data, but
> 'const type const *' is just a const pointer (with duplicate). The
> patches have made the data non-const?
Sorry, that patch is correct. It just removed the duplicate 'const',
but checkpatch is right to recommend the 'const * const' as the strings
could be put in a read-only section.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [PATCH] ARM: imx: clk-imx6sl: Suppress duplicate const sparse warning
2014-01-16 17:28 ` Bill Pringlemeir
@ 2014-01-17 5:44 ` Shawn Guo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2014-01-17 5:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:28:19PM -0500, Bill Pringlemeir wrote:
> On 16 Jan 2014, bpringlemeir at nbsps.com wrote:
>
> >> It was added into checkpatch.pl by commit cb710ec (scripts/checkpatch.pl:
> >> add warnings for static char that could be static const char). I'm not
> >> sure which warning we should ignore, the sparse or the checkpatch one.
>
> > I think both scripts/programs are right. There is a difference.
>
> > static const char const * step_sels[] = { "osc", "pll2_pfd2", }; /* dup */
> > static const char * const step_sels[] = { "osc", "pll2_pfd2", }; /* ok */
> > static char const * const step_sels[] = { "osc", "pll2_pfd2", }; /* ok */
>
> > I think that 'type const * const' is a const pointer to const data, but
> > 'const type const *' is just a const pointer (with duplicate). The
> > patches have made the data non-const?
>
> Sorry, that patch is correct. It just removed the duplicate 'const',
> but checkpatch is right to recommend the 'const * const' as the strings
> could be put in a read-only section.
Thanks for the comment, Bill. To fix the checkpatch warning, we will
need to change a lot of function declaration. That's why we ignore it
for now.
Shawn
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ARM: imx: clk-imx6sl: Suppress duplicate const sparse warning
2014-01-15 6:19 [PATCH] ARM: imx: clk-imx6sl: Suppress duplicate const sparse warning Liu Ying
2014-01-15 6:58 ` Shawn Guo
@ 2014-01-15 11:27 ` Shawn Guo
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2014-01-15 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 02:19:34PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
> There should be no duplicate const specifiers for those static
> constant character string arrays defined for clock mux options.
> Also, the arrays are only taken as the 5th argument for the
> imx_clk_mux() function, which is in the type of 'const char
> **parents'. So, let's remove the 2nd const specifier right
> after 'char'.
>
> This patch fixes these sparse warnings:
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:21:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:22:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:23:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:24:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:25:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:26:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:27:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:28:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:29:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:30:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:31:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:32:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:33:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:34:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:35:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:36:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:37:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:38:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:39:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:40:25: warning: duplicate const
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx6sl.c:41:25: warning: duplicate const
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Ying <Ying.Liu@freescale.com>
Applied both, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-01-17 5:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-01-15 6:19 [PATCH] ARM: imx: clk-imx6sl: Suppress duplicate const sparse warning Liu Ying
2014-01-15 6:58 ` Shawn Guo
2014-01-15 9:21 ` Joe Perches
2014-01-15 11:24 ` Shawn Guo
2014-01-16 17:06 ` Bill Pringlemeir
2014-01-16 17:28 ` Bill Pringlemeir
2014-01-17 5:44 ` Shawn Guo
2014-01-15 11:27 ` Shawn Guo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).