linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>,
	james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_SET_PMU attribute
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2021 14:25:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87czm718cp.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YbCj0IrjZoBR9dwQ@monolith.localdoman>

On Wed, 08 Dec 2021 12:23:44 +0000,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> This makes me wonder. Should KVM enforce having userspace either not
> setting the PMU for any VCPU, either setting it for all VCPUs? I think this
> would be a good idea and will reduce complexity in the long run. I also
> don't see a use case for userspace choosing to set the PMU for a subset of
> VCPUs, leaving the other VCPUs with the default behaviour.

Indeed. As much as I'm happy to expose a PMU to a guest on an
asymmetric system, I really do not want the asymmetry in the guest
itself. So this should be an all or nothing behaviour.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-12-08 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-06 17:02 [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: arm64: Improve PMU support on heterogeneous systems Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-06 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf: Fix wrong name in comment for struct perf_cpu_context Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-06 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: arm64: Keep a list of probed PMUs Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-06 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_SET_PMU attribute Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-08  3:13   ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-08 12:23     ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-08 12:43       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-08 14:25       ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-12-08 15:20         ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-08 15:44           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-08 16:11             ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-08 16:21               ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-06 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: arm64: Refuse to run VCPU if the PMU doesn't match the physical CPU Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-07 14:17   ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-08  7:54     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-08 10:38       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-13  7:40         ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-08  9:56     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-08 11:18       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-08  2:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: arm64: Improve PMU support on heterogeneous systems Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-08  8:05   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-13  6:36     ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-13 11:14       ` Alexandru Elisei
2021-12-14  6:24         ` Reiji Watanabe
2021-12-14 11:56           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-12-15  6:47             ` Reiji Watanabe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87czm718cp.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=reijiw@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).