From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Cc: suzuki.poulose@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] KVM: arm64: Move double-checked lock to kvm_vgic_map_resources()
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 14:36:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87czyvpb8p.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b686db4f-b520-6a33-4f09-d7c9cd024645@redhat.com>
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:55:51 +0000,
Auger Eric <eric.auger@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alexandru,
>
> On 12/1/20 4:01 PM, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> > kvm_vgic_map_resources() is called when a VCPU if first run and it maps all
> > the VGIC MMIO regions. To prevent double-initialization, the VGIC uses the
> > ready variable to keep track of the state of resources and the global KVM
> > mutex to protect against concurrent accesses. After the lock is taken, the
> > variable is checked again in case another VCPU took the lock between the
> > current VCPU reading ready equals false and taking the lock.
> >
> > The double-checked lock pattern is spread across four different functions:
> > in kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(), in kvm_vgic_map_resource() and in
> > vgic_{v2,v3}_map_resources(), which makes it hard to reason about and
> > introduces minor code duplication. Consolidate the checks in
> > kvm_vgic_map_resources(), where the lock is taken.
> >
> > No functional change intended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 8 +++-----
> > arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c | 6 ++++++
> > arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v2.c | 3 ---
> > arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c | 3 ---
> > 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> > index 9d69d2bf6943..65a5e89f5133 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> > @@ -530,11 +530,9 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > * Map the VGIC hardware resources before running a vcpu the
> > * first time on this VM.
> > */
> > - if (unlikely(!vgic_ready(kvm))) {
> > - ret = kvm_vgic_map_resources(kvm);
> > - if (ret)
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> > + ret = kvm_vgic_map_resources(kvm);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > } else {
> > /*
> > * Tell the rest of the code that there are userspace irqchip
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
> > index 32e32d67a127..a2f4d1c85f00 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c
> > @@ -428,7 +428,13 @@ int kvm_vgic_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm)
> > struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > + if (likely(vgic_ready(kvm)))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
> > + if (vgic_ready(kvm))
> > + goto out;
> > +
> While we are at it, the setting of dist->ready may be moved in
> kvm_vgic_map_resources() too.
Good point. FWIW, I have added an extra patch on top to that effect.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-27 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-01 15:01 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: arm64: Miscellaneous improvements Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-01 15:01 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: Documentation: Add arm64 KVM_RUN error codes Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-01 15:01 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: arm64: arch_timer: Remove VGIC initialization check Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-14 12:45 ` Auger Eric
2020-12-01 15:01 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: arm64: Move double-checked lock to kvm_vgic_map_resources() Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-14 12:55 ` Auger Eric
2020-12-27 14:36 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-12-01 15:01 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm64: Update comment in kvm_vgic_map_resources() Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-14 12:59 ` Auger Eric
2020-12-01 15:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: arm64: Remove redundant call to kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset() Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-14 13:48 ` Auger Eric
2020-12-14 14:02 ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-15 9:15 ` Auger Eric
2020-12-27 14:41 ` [PATCH 0/5] KVM: arm64: Miscellaneous improvements Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87czyvpb8p.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).