linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: alex.bennee@linaro.org (Alex Bennée)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 18/28] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around EFI runtime service calls
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 12:01:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d16ta6ih.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1504198860-12951-19-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>


Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> writes:

> The EFI runtime services ABI allows EFI to make free use of the
> FPSIMD registers during EFI runtime service calls, subject to the
> callee-save requirements of the AArch64 procedure call standard.
>
> However, the SVE architecture allows upper bits of the SVE vector
> registers to be zeroed as a side-effect of FPSIMD V-register
> writes.  This means that the SVE vector registers must be saved in
> their entirety in order to avoid data loss: non-SVE-aware EFI
> implementations cannot restore them correctly.
>
> The non-IRQ case is already handled gracefully by
> kernel_neon_begin().  For the IRQ case, this patch allocates a
> suitable per-CPU stash buffer for the full SVE register state and
> uses it to preserve the affected registers around EFI calls.  It is
> currently unclear how the EFI runtime services ABI will be
> clarified with respect to SVE, so it safest to assume that the
> predicate registers and FFR must be saved and restored too.
>
> No attempt is made to restore the restore the vector length after
> a call, for now.  It is deemed rather insane for EFI to change it,
> and contemporary EFI implementations certainly won't.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Alex Benn?e <alex.bennee@linaro.org>

>
> ---
>
> Changes since v1
> ----------------
>
> Requested by Ard Biesheuvel:
>
> * Fix unbalanced ifelse bracing to conform to the kernel coding style.
>
> * Make efi_sve_state_used static.
>
> Changes related to Alex Benn?e's comments:
>
> * Migrate away from magic numbers for SVE_VQ_BYTES.
>
> Other:
>
> * Rename sve_kernel_mode_neon_setup() to sve_efi_setup().
> The EFI FPSIMD code is something semi-independent from kernel-mode NEON
> now, so the "neon" in the names no longer really makes sense.
>
> * Make the EFI FPSIMD setup code dependent on CONFIG_EFI (it's not
> supposed to work with CONFIG_EFI=n anyway).
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> index dd89acf..fff9fcf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> @@ -118,11 +118,13 @@ static int sve_default_vl = -1;
>  int __ro_after_init sve_max_vl = -1;
>  /* Set of available vector lengths, as vq_to_bit(vq): */
>  static __ro_after_init DECLARE_BITMAP(sve_vq_map, SVE_VQ_MAX);
> +static void __percpu *efi_sve_state;
>
>  #else /* ! CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
>
>  /* Dummy declaration for code that will be optimised out: */
>  extern __ro_after_init DECLARE_BITMAP(sve_vq_map, SVE_VQ_MAX);
> +extern void __percpu *efi_sve_state;
>
>  #endif /* ! CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
>
> @@ -447,6 +449,23 @@ int sve_verify_vq_map(void)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>
> +static void __init sve_efi_setup(void)
> +{
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI))
> +		return;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * alloc_percpu() warns and prints a backtrace if this goes wrong.
> +	 * This is evidence of a crippled system and we are returning void,
> +	 * so no attempt is made to handle this situation here.
> +	 */
> +	BUG_ON(!sve_vl_valid(sve_max_vl));
> +	efi_sve_state = __alloc_percpu(
> +		SVE_SIG_REGS_SIZE(sve_vq_from_vl(sve_max_vl)), SVE_VQ_BYTES);
> +	if (!efi_sve_state)
> +		panic("Cannot allocate percpu memory for EFI SVE save/restore");
> +}
> +
>  void __init sve_setup(void)
>  {
>  	u64 zcr;
> @@ -482,6 +501,8 @@ void __init sve_setup(void)
>  		sve_max_vl);
>  	pr_info("SVE: default vector length %u bytes per vector\n",
>  		sve_default_vl);
> +
> +	sve_efi_setup();
>  }
>
>  void fpsimd_release_thread(struct task_struct *dead_task)
> @@ -783,6 +804,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_neon_end);
>
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct fpsimd_state, efi_fpsimd_state);
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, efi_fpsimd_state_used);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, efi_sve_state_used);
>
>  /*
>   * EFI runtime services support functions
> @@ -808,10 +830,24 @@ void __efi_fpsimd_begin(void)
>
>  	WARN_ON(preemptible());
>
> -	if (may_use_simd())
> +	if (may_use_simd()) {
>  		kernel_neon_begin();
> -	else {
> -		fpsimd_save_state(this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state));
> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * If !efi_sve_state, SVE can't be in use yet and doesn't need
> +		 * preserving:
> +		 */
> +		if (system_supports_sve() && likely(efi_sve_state)) {
> +			char *sve_state = this_cpu_ptr(efi_sve_state);
> +
> +			__this_cpu_write(efi_sve_state_used, true);
> +
> +			sve_save_state(sve_state + sve_ffr_offset(sve_max_vl),
> +				       &this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state)->fpsr);
> +		} else {
> +			fpsimd_save_state(this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state));
> +		}
> +
>  		__this_cpu_write(efi_fpsimd_state_used, true);
>  	}
>  }
> @@ -824,10 +860,22 @@ void __efi_fpsimd_end(void)
>  	if (!system_supports_fpsimd())
>  		return;
>
> -	if (__this_cpu_xchg(efi_fpsimd_state_used, false))
> -		fpsimd_load_state(this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state));
> -	else
> +	if (!__this_cpu_xchg(efi_fpsimd_state_used, false)) {
>  		kernel_neon_end();
> +	} else {
> +		if (system_supports_sve() &&
> +		    likely(__this_cpu_read(efi_sve_state_used))) {
> +			char const *sve_state = this_cpu_ptr(efi_sve_state);
> +
> +			sve_load_state(sve_state + sve_ffr_offset(sve_max_vl),
> +				       &this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state)->fpsr,
> +				       sve_vq_from_vl(sve_get_vl()) - 1);
> +
> +			__this_cpu_write(efi_sve_state_used, false);
> +		} else {
> +			fpsimd_load_state(this_cpu_ptr(&efi_fpsimd_state));
> +		}
> +	}
>  }
>
>  #endif /* CONFIG_KERNEL_MODE_NEON */


--
Alex Benn?e

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-14 11:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-31 17:00 [PATCH v2 00/28] ARM Scalable Vector Extension (SVE) Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 01/28] regset: Add support for dynamically sized regsets Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 02/28] arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU features from guests Dave Martin
2017-09-13 14:37   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-15  0:04     ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 03/28] arm64: efi: Add missing Kconfig dependency on KERNEL_MODE_NEON Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 04/28] arm64: Port deprecated instruction emulation to new sysctl interface Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 05/28] arm64: fpsimd: Simplify uses of {set, clear}_ti_thread_flag() Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 06/28] arm64/sve: System register and exception syndrome definitions Dave Martin
2017-09-13 14:48   ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 07/28] arm64/sve: Low-level SVE architectural state manipulation functions Dave Martin
2017-09-13 15:39   ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 08/28] arm64/sve: Kconfig update and conditional compilation support Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 09/28] arm64/sve: Signal frame and context structure definition Dave Martin
2017-09-13 13:36   ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 21:33     ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 10/28] arm64/sve: Low-level CPU setup Dave Martin
2017-09-13 13:32   ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 19:21     ` Dave Martin
2017-10-05 10:47       ` Dave Martin
2017-10-05 11:04         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-10-05 11:22           ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 11/28] arm64/sve: Core task context handling Dave Martin
2017-09-13 14:33   ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-14 19:55     ` Dave Martin
2017-09-20 13:58       ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-03 11:11         ` Dave Martin
2017-10-04 17:29           ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-03 11:33     ` Dave Martin
2017-10-05 11:28       ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-06 13:10         ` Dave Martin
2017-10-06 13:36           ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-06 15:15             ` Dave Martin
2017-10-06 15:33               ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 17:26   ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 19:17     ` Dave Martin
2017-09-13 22:21       ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-14 19:40         ` Dave Martin
2017-09-19 17:13           ` Catalin Marinas
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 12/28] arm64/sve: Support vector length resetting for new processes Dave Martin
2017-09-14  8:47   ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 13/28] arm64/sve: Signal handling support Dave Martin
2017-09-14  9:30   ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 14/28] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length Dave Martin
2017-09-13 17:29   ` Catalin Marinas
2017-09-13 19:06     ` Dave Martin
2017-09-13 22:11       ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-05 16:42         ` Dave Martin
2017-10-05 16:53           ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-05 17:04             ` Dave Martin
2017-09-20 10:57   ` Alan Hayward
2017-09-20 10:59   ` Alan Hayward
2017-09-20 11:09     ` Dave Martin
2017-09-20 18:08       ` Alan Hayward
2017-09-21 11:19         ` Dave Martin
2017-09-21 11:57           ` Alan Hayward
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 15/28] arm64: cpufeature: Move sys_caps_initialised declarations Dave Martin
2017-09-14  9:33   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14  9:35   ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 16/28] arm64/sve: Probe SVE capabilities and usable vector lengths Dave Martin
2017-09-14  9:45   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-28 14:22     ` Dave Martin
2017-09-28 17:32       ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 17/28] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around kernel-mode NEON use Dave Martin
2017-09-14 10:52   ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 18/28] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around EFI runtime service calls Dave Martin
2017-09-14 11:01   ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 19/28] arm64/sve: ptrace and ELF coredump support Dave Martin
2017-09-06 16:21   ` Okamoto, Takayuki
2017-09-06 18:16     ` Dave Martin
2017-09-07  5:11       ` Okamoto, Takayuki
2017-09-08 13:11         ` Dave Martin
2017-09-14 12:57   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-28 14:57     ` Dave Martin
2017-09-29 12:46     ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 20/28] arm64/sve: Add prctl controls for userspace vector length management Dave Martin
2017-09-14 13:02   ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 21/28] arm64/sve: Add sysctl to set the default vector length for new processes Dave Martin
2017-09-14 13:05   ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 22/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE Dave Martin
2017-09-14 13:28   ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 23/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Treat guest SVE use as undefined instruction execution Dave Martin
2017-09-14 13:30   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-14 13:31   ` Alex Bennée
2017-09-29 13:00     ` Dave Martin
2017-09-29 14:43       ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 24/28] arm64/sve: KVM: Hide SVE from CPU features exposed to guests Dave Martin
2017-09-14 13:32   ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 25/28] arm64/sve: Detect SVE and activate runtime support Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 26/28] arm64/sve: Add documentation Dave Martin
2017-10-05 16:39   ` Szabolcs Nagy
2017-10-05 17:02     ` Dave Martin
2017-10-06 15:43   ` Szabolcs Nagy
2017-10-06 17:37     ` Dave Martin
2017-10-09  9:34       ` Alex Bennée
2017-10-09  9:49         ` Dave Martin
2017-10-09 14:07           ` Alex Bennée
2017-10-09 16:20             ` Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 27/28] arm64: signal: Report signal frame size to userspace via auxv Dave Martin
2017-08-31 17:01 ` [RFC PATCH v2 28/28] arm64/sve: signal: Include SVE when computing AT_MINSIGSTKSZ Dave Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d16ta6ih.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).