From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gregory.clement@free-electrons.com (Gregory CLEMENT) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:01:32 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v3 09/13] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup soc DT warning In-Reply-To: <20161118095455.00bfe007@free-electrons.com> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Fri, 18 Nov 2016 09:54:55 +0100") References: <20161117230830.31047-1-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <20161117230830.31047-10-gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> <20161118095455.00bfe007@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <87d1htb1qr.fsf@free-electrons.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Thomas, On ven., nov. 18 2016, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:08:26 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: > >> - soc { >> + /* The following unit address is composed of the target >> + * value (bit [40-47]), attributes value (bits [32-39], >> + * and the address value in the window memory: [0-31]. >> + */ >> + soc at f00100000000 { > > Where is this value coming from? Why does the soc node needs to have a It cames from the dts files. > unit address? It doesn't have a 'reg' property if I remember > correctly. But it has a range property. Gregory > > Thomas > -- > Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > http://free-electrons.com -- Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com