From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: robert.jarzmik@free.fr (Robert Jarzmik) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 12:17:25 +0200 Subject: [GIT PULL] pxa for v4.4 References: <878u72zlif.fsf@belgarion.home> <20151023171539.GB2224@localhost> Message-ID: <87d1w4wagr.fsf@belgarion.home> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Olof Johansson writes: > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 09:00:40PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> Hi Arnd, Kevin and Olof, >> >> This is the pxa pull request for 4.4 cycle. It is mainly magician enhancement >> and fixes. Could you please consider pulling ? >> >> The following changes since commit 6ff33f3902c3b1c5d0db6b1e2c70b6d76fba357f: >> >> Linux 4.3-rc1 (2015-09-12 16:35:56 -0700) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> https://github.com/rjarzmik/linux.git pxa-for-4.4 > > Hi Robert, > > I'm glad to see all this activity on PXA! You're reaching the amount of new > stuff that it's time to start splitting up in topics. I'll merge this branch > for this release, but I'm also going to go through below and show you how this > can/should be split up in the future. Ok, great ! > First, take a look at our tree and how it's organized. Look at my presentation > from ELC 2014, or Arnd's from this year, to get an idea of the philosophy we > use and roughly how we categorize patches. Ok, just did. I must admit I've been a bit lazy in this cycle, as I already have my tree split into cleanup/fix/for-next/dt ... For cleanup, I understand it all. For the single fix, I wasn't aware I could make pull request before a merge window for fixes, I though I could only issue them for post -rc1 series. >> Petr Cvek (22): > Most of these are fixes/cleanups. With a burst of patches like this it can > sometimes be hard to rip them apart and put some in one bucked and others in > another. Feel free to keep them in a separate topic in that case > (magician-cleanup or similar) All right, understood, that translates into a separate pull request. > Board code, of which we tend to have almost none these days. :-) I know, I'm working on the ablation, it's just the patient is long to cure :) >> Thierry Reding (17): > This could also be a topic on its own. We'd merge it into the cleanup branch at > our end, but you can provide it as a separate branch if you want. Okay, understood. > Don't hesitate to ask if you have questions on how to handle this down the > road. Okay, thanks. I'll try to split better next time. If I see I have another heavy pull-request (at least heavy in a dying architecture context), I'll try to provide the pull requests earlier, at -rc4, to let you time to correct me if I messed it up. Cheers. -- Robert