From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: khilman@linaro.org (Kevin Hilman)
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:13:15 -0700
Subject: [PATCH V5 0/6] ARM: OMAP3+: support cpufreq-cpu0 for device tree
 boot
In-Reply-To: <524DA41C.7000809@ti.com> (Nishanth Menon's message of "Thu, 3
 Oct 2013 12:06:36 -0500")
References: <1368039976-29648-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com>
 <87pprmuwxg.fsf@linaro.org> <524DA41C.7000809@ti.com>
Message-ID: <87d2nmun8k.fsf@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> writes:

> fixing Benoit's mail ID.
> On 10/03/2013 11:43 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Hi Nishanth,
>> 
>> Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> writes:
>> 
>>> The following version 5 of the series arose from trying to use
>>> BeagleBoard-XM (OMAP3 variant) for doing CPU DVFS using cpufreq-cpu0.
>>> This series enables the generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver to be used in
>>> device tree enabled boot while maintaining support of the legacy
>>> omap-cpufreq driver when used in non device tree enabled boot.
>> 
>> What's the status of this series?  Is it still waiting on the clock DT
>> changes?
>
> yes - i do have a new series lined up at the moment here[1] - trying
> to ensure everything is dandy before public post. ofcourse, we'd like
> to ensure we have feedback on tero's series[2]. I am now working on
> ensuring ABB regulator[3](again depends on Tero's series) fits on top
> of Mike's voltage notifier series[4]
>
> So, yep, everything is blocked due to lack of feedback on Tero's
> series [2].

OK, thanks for the update. 

Kevin