linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: khilman@linaro.org (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-twl: ensure IRQ is wakeup enabled
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 08:32:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d2s0zi7v.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51AF4C0D.3060203@ti.com> (Grygorii Strashko's message of "Wed, 5 Jun 2013 17:32:45 +0300")

Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> writes:

> On 06/04/2013 08:46 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> writes:
>>
>>> Hi Kevin,
>>>
>>> On 06/01/2013 01:37 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>>> Currently, the RTC IRQ is never wakeup-enabled so is not capable of
>>>> bringing the system out of suspend.
>>>>
>>>> On OMAP platforms, we have gotten by without this because the TWL RTC
>>>> is on an I2C-connected chip which is capable of waking up the OMAP via
>>>> the IO ring when the OMAP is in low-power states.
>>>>
>>>> However, if the OMAP suspends without hitting the low-power states
>>>> (and the IO ring is not enabled), RTC wakeups will not work because
>>>> the IRQ is not wakeup enabled.
>>> As I understand, IRQ wake up capabilities are set/clear simultaneously with
>>> IRQ unmasking/masking on OMAP4+ in omap-wakeupgen.c.
>>> So, it should work without this patch on OMAP4+.
>> It might work on OMAP4 for wakeup from suspend, but without properly
>> declaring the IRQ as a wakeup source, it will not abort suspend if the
>> RTC fires during the suspend process.  To abort suspend, the IRQ must be
>> declared as a wakeup IRQ.
>>
>>> But if TWL is used on non OMAP4+ platform then it is needed.  (OMAP3:
>>> I haven't found the place where IRQ wakeup capabilities are
>>> configured, would be appreciate if you can point me on)
>> IRQ wakeup is a genirq feature that trickles into the irq_chip (in OMAP3
>> case, it's the twl4030 irq_chip.)
>>
>> On OMAP3, as mentioned in the changelog, RTC wake has been working fine
>> without this because we default to CORE retention, so wakeup happens via
>> the IO ring.  However, if you prevent retention during suspend, then
>> this IRQ will not wake the system.
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>>>> To fix, ensure the RTC IRQ is wakeup enabled whenever the RTC alarm is
>>>> set.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
>>>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>>>> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>>>>    1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
>>>> index 8751a52..bbda0fd 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
>>>> @@ -213,12 +213,24 @@ static int mask_rtc_irq_bit(unsigned char bit)
>>>>      static int twl_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned
>>>> enabled)
>>>>    {
>>>> +	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>>>> +	int irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>>>> +	static bool twl_rtc_wake_enabled;
>>>>    	int ret;
>>>>    -	if (enabled)
>>>> +	if (enabled) {
>>>>    		ret = set_rtc_irq_bit(BIT_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG_IT_ALARM_M);
>>>> -	else
>>>> +		if (device_can_wakeup(dev) && !twl_rtc_wake_enabled) {
>>>> +			enable_irq_wake(irq);
>>>> +			twl_rtc_wake_enabled = true;
>>>> +		}
>>>> +	} else {
>>>>    		ret = mask_rtc_irq_bit(BIT_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG_IT_ALARM_M);
>>>> +		if (twl_rtc_wake_enabled) {
>>>> +			disable_irq_wake(irq);
>>>> +			twl_rtc_wake_enabled = false;
>>>> +		}
>>>> +	}
>>>>      	return ret;
>>>>    }
>>> twl-rtc has suspend/resume callbacks implemented, so I think it's the
>>> better place
>>> for this code and twl_rtc_wake_enabled can be dropped.
>> In theory, that might be the better place (and that's where I put these
>> at first), but unfortunately, it doesn't work that way because the
>> twl6030-irq core enables/diables the parent IRQ wake feature using PM
>> notifiers (which was done to avoid potential lock recursion[1].)
>>
>> During suspend, the notifier runs at suspend_prepare() time, which is
>> well before the driver's ->suspend() method is called.  The result is
>> that the parents IRQ wakeup capabilies are never set.
> Sorry, forget about this patch - have no questions for this patch anymore.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Just FYI. It seems, The suspend will never be aborted on OMAP4 by SYSN_IRQ
> because of these two patches:
> 782baa2 mfd: Disable twl6030 IRQ during suspend
> 9c6079a genirq: Do not consider disabled wakeup irqs

You're right for the parent TWL IRQ, but the child interrupts (e.g. RTC)
would still abort suspend if wakeup enabled.

Kevin

      reply	other threads:[~2013-06-05 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-31 22:37 [PATCH] rtc: rtc-twl: ensure IRQ is wakeup enabled Kevin Hilman
2013-06-03 23:13 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-04 17:54   ` Kevin Hilman
2013-06-04 11:32 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-06-04 17:46   ` Kevin Hilman
2013-06-05 14:32     ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-06-05 15:32       ` Kevin Hilman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d2s0zi7v.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=khilman@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).