linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	arnd@arndb.de, will@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	harisokn@amazon.com, cl@gentwo.org, ast@kernel.org,
	memxor@gmail.com, zhenglifeng1@huawei.com,
	xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, joao.m.martins@oracle.com,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timewait()
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2025 14:34:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ecsor126.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aLWDt9NpfYO_Utky@arm.com>


Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> writes:

> On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 01:07:31AM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
>> Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timewait(), which extends
>> smp_cond_load_relaxed() to allow waiting for a finite duration.
>>
>> The additional parameter allows for the timeout check.
>>
>> The waiting is done via the usual cpu_relax() spin-wait around the
>> condition variable with periodic evaluation of the time-check.
>>
>> The number of times we spin is defined by SMP_TIMEWAIT_SPIN_COUNT
>> (chosen to be 200 by default) which, assuming each cpu_relax()
>> iteration takes around 20-30 cycles (measured on a variety of x86
>> platforms), amounts to around 4000-6000 cycles.
>>
>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
>
> Apart from the name, this looks fine (I'd have preferred the "timeout"
> suffix).

So, the suffix "timewait" made sense to me because I was trying to
differentiate with spinwait etc.

Given that that issue is no longer meaningful, "timeout" makes more sense.

Will change.

> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Thanks for this and all the reviews.

--
ankur


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-03  0:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-29  8:07 [PATCH v4 0/5] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_*_timewait() Ankur Arora
2025-08-29  8:07 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timewait() Ankur Arora
2025-09-01 11:29   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-02 21:34     ` Ankur Arora [this message]
2025-08-29  8:07 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] arm64: " Ankur Arora
2025-09-01 11:47   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-02 22:40     ` Ankur Arora
2025-08-29  8:07 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait Ankur Arora
2025-09-01 11:47   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-29  8:07 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2025-09-01 11:47   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-08-29  8:07 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] rqspinlock: use smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2025-09-01 11:28   ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-02 17:43     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-02 21:30       ` Ankur Arora
2025-09-02 21:31     ` Ankur Arora
2025-08-29 18:54 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_*_timewait() Okanovic, Haris
2025-08-29 22:38   ` Ankur Arora
2025-09-01 11:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-02 22:46   ` Ankur Arora
2025-09-03  9:27     ` Catalin Marinas
2025-09-03 18:34       ` Ankur Arora
2025-09-03 15:56   ` Okanovic, Haris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ecsor126.fsf@oracle.com \
    --to=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=harisokn@amazon.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).