From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A489CC3ABC0 for ; Wed, 7 May 2025 13:55:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=+78+2+2l+vz4thd4fzsZIiDpYheZnEoUC6X/M8JFQ+I=; b=1mocFQRZ8C0yMUOe/2T4Mknn0i OEB9KILsnrV8OZ6I5kAzf37oX0MWckVfyWhIauSS0u/y/dITyQh69J6W9D5fDCXOlDg8d3KE7qxPP JM3ZV5YfKgAAk1cstMr+SpLcDk4mrMnlVU7t6kB3hTshpSgzmGl+kzyVjiZAkX0obG8n+jqoKb66T vh8Wwi1sbEO0QY7SR2eYIH1xFIPqQdAvkyZ694+v535VR8kTv3cKNPP54apaXInNF/zk0zb1GfCMG xUz/0v1se6VmKf6GkgHG8OIRCR+rPwVUAAIbacJYKAH6bpbi/PEjzsc8yXENKzx1Bo8X1Oop3nkgj DkV8Rjtg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uCfF4-0000000Fekh-1TM6; Wed, 07 May 2025 13:55:22 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uCf2s-0000000FbIJ-0DDr for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 07 May 2025 13:42:47 +0000 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1746625362; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+78+2+2l+vz4thd4fzsZIiDpYheZnEoUC6X/M8JFQ+I=; b=shOSxWFZela5XBLLbauvJz9BG7m+vqSD0Gy+bN4oCEnkdqUNvURj+ZqKa26k7Yhx050RTI y0evKBTwX+2HhVBFGikRYaSMpFzbdf3qCBFhZ1aVeYmp1HL+Rlqj0fwMh+IoUxTiZejTt0 V7HSXvo9DwC8S7pe0MzLSkm4/IJZFFe4UEOT58nZIam9xY6vye2DF0uvNTN4uRiZ0h8CSi jwN6IqfZ+a1Ebi5yyxkwOsY2lE9ZI3J1lKOTngOD0rDvtVTg7ylZPDQhznHloukop+QMK+ XqDCXf1o9eFcrQA7mNGJOMqVjHA6v1ycMdgcbWUdmxfrLlgm0j64iwqgWzw2wQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1746625362; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+78+2+2l+vz4thd4fzsZIiDpYheZnEoUC6X/M8JFQ+I=; b=NXcqGGelg10I9lqrw8our10jEDm1FPuD5NTxtrDwGvSU2XzWT6j6WMq8MIDa9K547nbkqR SlQVWlkvvexVEABw== To: Marc Zyngier Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Arnd Bergmann , Sascha Bischoff , Timothy Hayes , "Liam R. Howlett" , Mark Rutland , Jiri Slaby , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 20/25] irqchip/gic-v5: Add GICv5 PPI support In-Reply-To: <86a57ohjey.wl-maz@kernel.org> References: <20250506-gicv5-host-v3-0-6edd5a92fd09@kernel.org> <20250506-gicv5-host-v3-20-6edd5a92fd09@kernel.org> <87zffpn5rk.ffs@tglx> <86a57ohjey.wl-maz@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 07 May 2025 15:42:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87ecx0mt9p.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250507_064246_227312_66C1813C X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.44 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, May 07 2025 at 10:14, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Tue, 06 May 2025 16:00:31 +0100, > Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> How does this test distinguish between LEVEL_LOW and LEVEL_HIGH? It only >> tests for level, no? So the test is interesting at best ... > > There is no distinction between HIGH and LOW, RISING and FALLING, in > any revision of the GIC architecture. Then pretending that there is a set_type() functionality is pretty daft