From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Generic entry for ARM
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 12:13:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ecz2zelf.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZCiiMTwf7eGJJ9aCKFOC3_xTGv1JKQUijjyp+_++cZ_A@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 28 2025 at 13:49, Linus Walleij wrote:
> please consider pulling the following git branch for generic entry,
> see below.
>
> This branch was just harvested from my own v5 patch series on
> lore with b4 am -t 20250225-arm-generic-entry-v5-0-2f02313653e5@linaro.org
> then git am on top of v6.14-rc1, so you can do the same if you
> prefer.
>
> It's possible to squash patches, even all of them into one
> big all-or-nothing patch, given the not very gradual nature generic
> entry conversion seems to have.
>
> Main upsides and downsides are in the signed tag.
>
> I don't know who the most important stakeholders are, but I guess
> the context tracker maintainer (Paul McKenney) and the people working
> on generic entry (tglx) could have a say on how important this is, or isn't.
>
> I think it's pretty neat.
It's valuable to consolidate these common functionalities across
architectures as it reduces maintainence costs.
I read through the patches and did not find anything offending there.
Thanks for doing that!
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-12 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-28 12:49 [GIT PULL] Generic entry for ARM Linus Walleij
2025-03-12 11:13 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-03-12 18:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-03-31 21:48 ` Linus Walleij
2025-04-07 17:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-04-07 23:47 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2025-04-08 0:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-04-09 14:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-02 15:23 phil995511
2025-03-02 17:17 ` Russell King (Oracle)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ecz2zelf.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).