From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1430C28B28 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 11:23:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=UYwUjaR6v1q5/fQ/hypQGLb8gy+5OfN5YPZ0I1ZBiRY=; b=R/DkZ3aMErijsGbUHnwg4Q1Zji +zKLq0abgo+0ohvy4R1hxjCsSFUvtH86JRyWL/nlmRp6FuwVOiYiLWBK6kdx/xBU1nekw+Khx2KBx 4RtCY+ipqQPeXkw1wIIuM/q52o9uAiYWSgBDe/puUCmnxI8FquSGVDT/1IIxapbLzYGfp0mLEMSmZ QYOTXOthM65iyNEIbK0y9DdQlF6vUOx4Lms7KESrMQVuyz9RmQkEJigHB9t2CGW4xXVtRoPNSDJ4L 8DaJDi3lvYh5MtPoroQK0jcJg9cLeZ1JuSepzII18a1TSKHvdspseKfTe3fVPk3+cavOX7BjiQWuQ njN6pcpQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tsKB4-00000008F39-28Xo; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 11:23:10 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tsK1n-00000008Dpo-3O0F for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 11:13:37 +0000 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1741778012; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UYwUjaR6v1q5/fQ/hypQGLb8gy+5OfN5YPZ0I1ZBiRY=; b=gxmrM4/m2Wt5JxPlKmgnKRLZRmBCBhcnTiN1uFdwuaQH030fM0iTodcR3mwiSwUwYlbHsm iR9Nn7JjkUBCR0K9Hta/OkoXomkdkS36havPDroloZuuLAb7LcLcNXXUKYebOydppcz6Kp sDSjVJdC2kAm58jGCmk/uNNLr3+UhcOAR3SNqdi2UFFYW/YNzB8L2Tt2zlrkbXmF45fFTw oXrEtszEXSR91P9pwJMxTiNgtBIwHe0BYUTW/6GSkgT0jhXzeEuH1sPd0HSEKIVLyWS/Dr gqaO2KgnusML2AAcdrrcx3iyuAvGZo7ZHf582gSfpLBqgBpR13Yxg3iWAfGolg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1741778012; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UYwUjaR6v1q5/fQ/hypQGLb8gy+5OfN5YPZ0I1ZBiRY=; b=Qcr4dsqJiy327DE7wJ6oI0CAzPdppIEwqEJmnCx/6TzoobWgsGgXmWZgQ1h/nzjVvRdxCd 6zE2N6gjr8DmTOCg== To: Linus Walleij , Russell King Cc: Linux ARM , Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel , "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Generic entry for ARM In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 12:13:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87ecz2zelf.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250312_041335_992294_5B7A961B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.22 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Feb 28 2025 at 13:49, Linus Walleij wrote: > please consider pulling the following git branch for generic entry, > see below. > > This branch was just harvested from my own v5 patch series on > lore with b4 am -t 20250225-arm-generic-entry-v5-0-2f02313653e5@linaro.org > then git am on top of v6.14-rc1, so you can do the same if you > prefer. > > It's possible to squash patches, even all of them into one > big all-or-nothing patch, given the not very gradual nature generic > entry conversion seems to have. > > Main upsides and downsides are in the signed tag. > > I don't know who the most important stakeholders are, but I guess > the context tracker maintainer (Paul McKenney) and the people working > on generic entry (tglx) could have a say on how important this is, or isn't. > > I think it's pretty neat. It's valuable to consolidate these common functionalities across architectures as it reduces maintainence costs. I read through the patches and did not find anything offending there. Thanks for doing that! Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner