From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B11ABC433F5 for ; Mon, 9 May 2022 15:01:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=1roO/tMGFcOzWiYEns3wdgTtW3x3gDOB9qtvJxmssE8=; b=MvUJC0cj6/Y9ed lkCr6+NIYpc/ygN9DPh6msnfK5vRA0DNEyqfcaGOznej1KwrHyZi0leF725Luu8VODYn5QCP52o6U knNDTtxefGjCBfvlObSJcr7LYp9ieLVVjgml4imMo5nJQa4NhUMds1gbqU/qxXA3sLKRdl4pnpnub j7N0EvHJQso9l/ZyGFyn7n9CC2Ei4iq7f6mt7JOV56C9mcJ83M060/wiKDGZOR0CSLBTN3ki14u1+ DVTwWJU3/H/6Zi42A5aixFwYotx+EFNxay8O2n+FAqe51hcIMNizn+/mZ9TtPfVCpzaItjXOV9qYR BsOExiPBc/lIwNuCVvAA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1no4rX-00Exzh-OK; Mon, 09 May 2022 14:59:51 +0000 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1no4rU-00ExzO-Hc for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 09 May 2022 14:59:49 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1652108386; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=slp31txvRJ+dD2+/oLnVhE7gf3HRncvTSf+q+IK5c8M=; b=cTVFwSAqiIGQ+MK+du4/A5bQP3nnZRZfJihlIw1A3fy3RU/l6ycCpMVq6fqh7pnBdSnIxt ZJPHX7wHEIVkIvVTbU/7ZT+2eS2eFOd4hT7Tedi7c5VxtQrUl3zc8hPcm/mvTmFZvndM97 mvESZkOCFoeykmFJfdR9oDA2Zf3102g= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-645-tYLRIoRuMUKcPisgZAeaxg-1; Mon, 09 May 2022 10:59:41 -0400 X-MC-Unique: tYLRIoRuMUKcPisgZAeaxg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BA5C811E80; Mon, 9 May 2022 14:59:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.39.193.170]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04B9053CE; Mon, 9 May 2022 14:59:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Cornelia Huck To: Mark Brown Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Shuah Khan , Joey Gouly , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ARM64] status of MTE selftests? In-Reply-To: <87levb3u1s.fsf@redhat.com> Organization: Red Hat GmbH References: <87wney4svy.fsf@redhat.com> <87levb3u1s.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.34 (https://notmuchmail.org) Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 16:59:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87ee124uqz.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.11.54.5 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220509_075948_695240_484B2A2B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.35 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, May 09 2022, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, May 06 2022, Mark Brown wrote: > >> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 04:50:41PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> >>> I'm currently trying to run the MTE selftests on the FVP simulator (Base >>> Model)[1], mainly to verify things are sane on the host before wiring up >>> the KVM support in QEMU. However, I'm seeing some failures (the non-mte >>> tests seemed all fine): >> >>> Are the MTE tests supposed to work on the FVP model? Something broken in >>> my config? Anything I can debug? >> >> I would expect them to work, they seemed happy when I was doing >> the async mode support IIRC and a quick spin with -next in qemu >> everything seems fine, I'm travelling so don't have the >> environment for models to hand right now. > > Thanks; I think that points to some setup/config problem on my side, > then :/ (I ran the selftests under QEMU's tcg emulation, and while it > looks better, I still get timeouts for check_gcr_el1_cswitch and > check_user_mem.) ...so these two tests are simply very slow; if I run them directly, they take longer than 45s, but eventually finish. So all seems good (in a slow way) on QEMU + tcg. On the simulator, running check_gcr_el1_cswitch directly finishes successfully after several minutes as well; however, I get all the other failures in tests that I reported in my first mail even when I run them directly. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel