Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: mvebu: dt64 for v5.4 (#2)

From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	"Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	"Marek Behún" <marek.behun@nic.cz>, "SoC Team" <soc@kernel.org>,
	arm-soc <arm@kernel.org>, "Olof Johansson" <olof@lixom.net>,
	"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Sebastian Hesselbarth" <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: mvebu: dt64 for v5.4 (#2)
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 17:47:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ef0wvzax.fsf@FE-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a0igyBe-MQ9QcVMwCF4sx76MBVwtcsF=nFJf_sgYe2G2A@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Arnd,

> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 11:05 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 2:41 PM Gregory CLEMENT
>> <gregory.clement@bootlin.com> wrote:
>> > Here is the second pull request for dt64 for mvebu for v5.4.
>> >
>> > For the Turris Mox board there was dependencies with moxtet header which
>> > was already merged in your arm/drivers branch. That the reason why I
>> > merged this branch in my mvebu/dt64 branch.
>> >
>> > Let me know if it is a problem and if you want that I do it in a
>> > different way.
>>
>> I don't really like this, but it's too late to do it right now. The problem is
>> that I should have not picked up the patches from the list in the first
>> place if there are these dependencies.
>>
>> This could have been communicated better in the patch series, but
>> it really my own fault.
>>
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> > mvebu dt64 for 5.4 (part 2)
>> >
>> > Add support for Turris Mox board (Armada 3720 SoC based)
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Marek Behún (3):
>> >       arm64: dts: marvell: armada-37xx: add SPI CS1 pinctrl
>> >       dt-bindings: marvell: document Turris Mox compatible
>> >       arm64: dts: marvell: add DTS for Turris Mox
>>
>> I think the best way forward would be for me to apply the
>> remaining patches on top of the arm/drivers branch, to avoid
>> also pulling in your other DT changes into arm/drivers, or pulling
>> in all of arm/drivers into arm/dt.
>>
>> Would that work for you?
>
> I ended up creating an arm/late branch for other reasons, put
> this branch in there as well.

OK thanks!

Gregory

>
>       Arnd

-- 
Gregory Clement, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://bootlin.com

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel