From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: eric@anholt.net (Eric Anholt) Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 15:30:11 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm: bcm2835: Add the PMU to the devicetree. In-Reply-To: References: <20180517131727.29263-1-eric@anholt.net> Message-ID: <87efia1hjg.fsf@anholt.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Vince Weaver writes: > On Thu, 17 May 2018, Eric Anholt wrote: > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi >> index 7704bb029605..1f5e5c782835 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2837.dtsi >> @@ -17,6 +17,12 @@ >> }; >> }; >> >> + arm-pmu { >> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53-pmu", "arm,cortex-a7-pmu"; >> + interrupt-parent = <&local_intc>; >> + interrupts = <9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; >> + }; >> + > > why this and not > > arm-pmu { > compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3"; > interrupt-parent = <&local_intc>; > interrupts = <9>; > }; > > which works, though when I didn't get very far when I submitted the patch > to add this last August. Is that better than a53? I'm happy to switch to that. The important part to me is the a7, since basically everyone with this hw is running arm32. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 832 bytes Desc: not available URL: