public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: eric@anholt.net (Eric Anholt)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: RPi3 arm64 port status
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 22:53:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87egb0qv4r.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56F34D2C.9070609@wwwdotorg.org>

Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> writes:

> On 03/23/2016 07:52 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> I spent today working on getting aarch64 working on the Raspberry Pi 3.
>> Here's what I've got so far:
>>
>> U-Boot branch mostly based on srwarren's work:
>> https://github.com/anholt/u-boot/tree/rpi_dev
>>
>> (Check the commit messages there for necessary config.txt contents)
>>
>> My linux tree:
>> https://github.com/anholt/linux/tree/bcm2837-64
>>
>> Linux is booting to the point of initializing MMC.  As of recently, I'm
>> seeing MMC hangs at boot, and I haven't tracked down what's changed.
>>
>> I haven't implemented SMP yet.  Just like the 2836, the firmware has the
>> secondaries spinlooping in a little bit of firmware memory, watching a
>> channel of the the inter-processor mailboxes.  When the secondary sees
>> the channel get a value, it jumps to it.  This is the same on the new
>> 64-bit chips, even though the register we're communicating through is
>> only 32 bits.
>
> Are you sure about that? I was under the impression that on the RPi 2, 
> the secondary CPU spin loop was implemented in a short stub that the VC 
> firmware placed into RAM at address 0 (the default ARM CPU reset 
> vector), but that that for the RPi 3 in AArch64 mode, there was no such 
> stub available yet.
>
> As such I made U-Boot link to address 0, relied on setting kernel_old=1 
> in config.txt (which causes U-Boot to be loaded at address 0) and 
> enabled a similar secondary CPU spin loop in U-Boot by enabling 
> CONFIG_ARMV8_MULTIENTRY=y. The U-Boot code waits for a write to a memory 
> location (currently hard-coded to a somewhat randomly chosen 0x0FFFFFF0) 
> rather than for a message to appear in the HW mailbox.

You're right.  I hadn't noticed anything change about it in the firmware
logs, so I was assuming the same mechanism, but I hadn't read up on what
kernel_old was doing.  I haven't had any luck with releasing from the
pen you've set up, yet, but I'm also way too tired at this point to
trust anything I'm doing.

(Also, a patch that gets MMC unstuck is now on the branch)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160323/192ca96c/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-24  5:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-24  1:52 RPi3 arm64 port status Eric Anholt
2016-03-24  2:13 ` Stephen Warren
2016-03-24  5:53   ` Eric Anholt [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-03-24  1:49 Eric Anholt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87egb0qv4r.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net \
    --to=eric@anholt.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox