[PATCH] ARM: fix alignement of __bug_table section entries

Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-09-05T14:25:19Z

On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 03:48:38PM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 08:23:29AM +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> >> On old ARM chips, unaligned accesses to memory are not trapped and
> >> fixed. On module load, symbols are relocated, and the relocation of
> >> __bug_table symbols is done on a u32 basis. Yet the section is not
> >> aligned to a multiple of 4 address, but to a multiple of 2.
>
> Hi Russell,
>
> I dug deeper, and got another stack, unrelated to modules insertion but related
> to alignement fault (see [1] for reference). As before, this didn't happen on
> v4.1, but happens on linux-next.
> I'm wondering if alignement fixup does work in my case and if I understand it.
>
> This time I took my JTAG to have a look at the flow, in arch/arm/mm/alignment.c,
> where I added the small chunk in [2], which gave in my case :
> RJK: fault=4 instr=0x00000000 instrptr=0xc02b37c8 thumb_mode=0 tinstr=0x0000

Right, so as fault is nonzero, this means that we were unable to read the
instruction. That seems mad though - the instruction pointer is certainly
valid, and as we're using probe_kernel_address(), that switches to the
kernel "segment" before trying to read kernel addresses. That should
mean that __copy_from_user_inatomic() is able to read the instruction.

I think this is the root cause of the issue.

> The instruction (as seen with vmlinux disassembly or JTAG memory dump) is :
> 0xc02b37c8 <+372>: b2 50 c6 10 strhne r5, [r6], #2
>
> I must admit I fail to see how the following "fixup:" label can be reached with
> a "missed" copy_from_user() (fault == 4).

We can't fix up the fault if we failed to read the instruction causing the
fault - because we've no idea what register(s) will need updating.

> [1] New stack
> =============
> #0: pxa2xx-ac97 (Wolfson WM9713,WM9714)
> RJK: fault=4 instr=0x00000000 instrptr=0xc02b37c8 thumb_mode=0 tinstr=0x0000
> &Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address c3057661
> &pgd = c0004000
> "[c3057661] *pgd=a300040e(bad)
> Internal error: Oops: 803 [#1] PREEMPT ARM
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Not tainted 4.2.0-rc8-next-20150828+ #900
> Hardware name: MIO A701
> task: c3858bc0 ti: c385c000 task.ti: c385c000
> PC is at doc_read_data_area+0x174/0x370
> LR is at doc_read_page_getbytes+0x58/0x78
> pc : [<c02b37c8>] lr : [<c02b3a1c>] psr: a8000013
> sp : c385d8e0 ip : c07142b8 fp : c385d91c
> r10: c3aac540 r9 : c070ffc0 r8 : c385c000
> @QGi
> r7 : 00000002 r6 : c3057661 r5 : 0000c1e5 r4 : 0000000b
> r3 : 0000000a r2 : 0000000b r1 : c3057661 r0 : 00000000
> Flags: NzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none

It seems you have SW_DOMAIN_PAN enabled.

> Control: 0000397f Table: a0004000 DAC: 00000053

And the DACR for the parent context shows that user no-access, kernel
manager-access (iow, in the doc_read_data_area() function). I have to
wonder why that would be the case - I can't find anything that would
set the kernel to manager-access. There's no get_ds() or KERNEL_DS
reference in fs/ubifs or drivers/mtd.

> [3] Abort stack
> ===============
> #0 panic (fmt=0xc385d6c4 <incomplete sequence \344>) at kernel/panic.c:72
> #1 0xc000e788 in oops_end (regs=<optimized out>, signr=<optimized out>, flags=<optimized out>) at arch/arm/kernel/traps.c:311
> #2 die (str=0x68000013 "", regs=<optimized out>, err=-1014638958) at arch/arm/kernel/traps.c:333
> #3 0xc00137c0 in __do_kernel_fault (mm=0xc06e8c04 <init_mm>, addr=3271915105, fsr=2051, regs=0xc385d890) at arch/arm/mm/fault.c:150
> #4 0xc0013b10 in do_bad_area (addr=<optimized out>, fsr=<optimized out>, regs=<optimized out>) at arch/arm/mm/fault.c:198
> #5 0xc00166c8 in do_alignment (addr=3271915105, fsr=2051, regs=0xc385d890) at arch/arm/mm/alignment.c:900
> #6 0xc0009264 in do_DataAbort (addr=3271915105, fsr=2051, regs=0xc385d890) at arch/arm/mm/fault.c:550
> #7 0xc000f024 in __dabt_svc () at arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S:204

I'm afraid this isn't useful, and I think (as seems to be typical with gdb)
some of those values are completely wrong. There's no way "str" would
be 0x68000013 in frame 2 for example.

--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.