From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org (Arnaud Patard (Rtp)) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:13:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/4] Extend sdhci-esdhc-imx card_detect and write_protect support for mx5 In-Reply-To: <20110614064841.GB30295@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> (Shawn Guo's message of "Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:48:42 +0800") References: <1307702572-22066-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20110614064841.GB30295@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> Message-ID: <87ei2wk6na.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Shawn Guo writes: Hi, > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 06:42:48PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: >> The card-present polling within sdhci based driver is very expensive >> in terms of the impact to system performance. We observe a few >> system performance issues from Freescale and Linaro on mx5 platforms, >> which have been proved card polling related. >> >> The patch set extends the current sdhci-esdhc-imx card_detect and >> write_protect support to cover mx5 platforms, and solves above >> performance issues. >> >> Shawn Guo (4): >> mmc: sdhci: fix interrupt storm from card detection >> mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: SDHCI_CARD_PRESENT does not get cleared >> mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: remove "WP" from flag ESDHC_FLAG_GPIO_FOR_CD_WP >> mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: extend card_detect and write_protect support >> > Hi Arnaud, > > Any chance to play with it yet? I tried applying the patch 4 (v2) on mmc git and Sascha Hauer's for-next branch and failed. Can you please tell me on which tree should I apply it ? Thanks, Arnaud