linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: acpi: Fix incorrect check for default console message
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 13:44:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fra7a4a8.fsf@stealth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3d79dd24-b11b-7a21-d24b-3c6f85d54c0a@huawei.com> (Hanjun Guo's message of "Fri, 21 Nov 2025 10:40:30 +0800")

Hi Hanjun,

Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> writes:

> On 2025/10/30 22:21, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 02:19:41PM +0000, Punit Agrawal wrote:
>>> bad3fa2fb920 ("ACPI: Suppress misleading SPCR console message when
>>> SPCR table is absent") mistakenly assumes acpi_parse_spcr() returning
>>> 0 to indicate a failure to parse SPCR and prints a message to the
>>> kernel logs accordingly. In reality acpi_parse_spcr() returns 0 on
>>> success and -ERRNO on failure.
>>>
>>> Fix the faulty check to output the correct logging message.
>>>
>>> Fixes: bad3fa2fb920 ("ACPI: Suppress misleading SPCR console message when SPCR table is absent")
>>> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>> ---
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> After sending a patch to fix incorrect parsing of SPCR[0], I was still
>>> seeing inconsistent logging on arm64. The result is this nugget.
>>>
>>> Considering the pointless churn - I wondered if it isn't better to
>>> drop the message? If others agree, I can send a patch (and revert
>>> bad3fa2fb920 while at it).
>> I'd be happy dropping the message as it looks pretty useless to me,
>> especially given that the current logic is broken.
>
> Fine with me as well, in the acpi_parse_spcr() there is a default
> pr_info() for the console information, we can drop it here.

Thanks! I sent a follow up[0] that's been picked up as a fix for v6.18
(already merged).

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251031111138.1262202-1-punit.agrawal@oss.qualcomm.com/


      reply	other threads:[~2025-11-21 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-27 14:19 [PATCH] arm64: acpi: Fix incorrect check for default console message Punit Agrawal
2025-10-30 14:21 ` Will Deacon
2025-11-21  2:40   ` Hanjun Guo
2025-11-21 13:44     ` Punit Agrawal [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fra7a4a8.fsf@stealth \
    --to=punit.agrawal@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chenl311@chinatelecom.cn \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).