From: Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@epam.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: "kvmarm@lists.linux.dev" <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Chase Conklin <chase.conklin@arm.com>,
Eric Auger <eauger@redhat.com>,
Dmytro Terletskyi <Dmytro_Terletskyi@epam.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] KVM: arm64: nv: Sync nested timer state with FEAT_NV2
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2025 15:25:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87frl51tse.fsf@epam.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241217142321.763801-3-maz@kernel.org> (Marc Zyngier's message of "Tue, 17 Dec 2024 14:23:10 +0000")
Hi Marc,
Thank you for these patches. We (myself and Dmytro Terletskyi) are
trying to use this series to launch up Xen on Amazon Graviton 4 platform.
Graviton 4 is built on Neoverse V2 cores and does **not** support
FEAT_ECV. Looks like we have found issue in this particular patch on
this particular setup.
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> writes:
> Emulating the timers with FEAT_NV2 is a bit odd, as the timers
> can be reconfigured behind our back without the hypervisor even
> noticing. In the VHE case, that's an actual regression in the
> architecture...
>
> Co-developed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 3 +++
> include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
> index 1215df5904185..ee5f732fbbece 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arch_timer.c
> @@ -905,6 +905,50 @@ void kvm_timer_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> kvm_timer_blocking(vcpu);
> }
>
> +void kvm_timer_sync_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + /*
> + * When NV2 is on, guest hypervisors have their EL1 timer register
> + * accesses redirected to the VNCR page. Any guest action taken on
> + * the timer is postponed until the next exit, leading to a very
> + * poor quality of emulation.
> + */
> + if (!is_hyp_ctxt(vcpu))
> + return;
> +
> + if (!vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(vcpu)) {
> + /*
> + * A non-VHE guest hypervisor doesn't have any direct access
> + * to its timers: the EL2 registers trap (and the HW is
> + * fully emulated), while the EL0 registers access memory
> + * despite the access being notionally direct. Boo.
> + *
> + * We update the hardware timer registers with the
> + * latest value written by the guest to the VNCR page
> + * and let the hardware take care of the rest.
> + */
> + write_sysreg_el0(__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, CNTV_CTL_EL0), SYS_CNTV_CTL);
> + write_sysreg_el0(__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, CNTV_CVAL_EL0), SYS_CNTV_CVAL);
> + write_sysreg_el0(__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, CNTP_CTL_EL0), SYS_CNTP_CTL);
> + write_sysreg_el0(__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, CNTP_CVAL_EL0), SYS_CNTP_CVAL);
Here you are overwriting trapped/emulated state of EL2 vtimer with EL0
vtimer, which renders all writes to EL2 timer registers useless.
This is the behavior we observed:
1. Xen writes to CNTHP_CVAL_EL2, which is trapped and handled in
kvm_arm_timer_write_sysreg().
2. timer_set_cval() updates __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, CNTHP_CVAL_EL2)
3. timer_restore_state() updates real CNTP_CVAL_EL0 with value from
__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, CNTHP_CVAL_EL2)
(so far so good)
4. kvm_timer_sync_nested() is called and it updates real CNTP_CVAL_EL0
with __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, CNTP_CVAL_EL0), overwriting value that we got
from Xen.
The same stands for other hypervisor timer registers of course.
I am wondering, what is the correct fix for this issue?
Also, we are observing issues with timers in Dom0, which seems related
to this, but we didn't pinpoint exact problem yet.
--
WBR, Volodymyr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-26 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-17 14:23 [PATCH v2 00/12] KVM: arm64: Add NV timer support Marc Zyngier
2024-12-17 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] KVM: arm64: nv: Add handling of EL2-specific timer registers Marc Zyngier
2024-12-21 1:38 ` Oliver Upton
2024-12-21 9:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-12-21 21:58 ` Oliver Upton
2024-12-17 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] KVM: arm64: nv: Sync nested timer state with FEAT_NV2 Marc Zyngier
2025-01-06 2:19 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2025-01-26 15:25 ` Volodymyr Babchuk [this message]
2025-01-27 17:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-01-28 11:29 ` Volodymyr Babchuk
2025-01-28 12:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-01-28 13:56 ` Volodymyr Babchuk
2024-12-17 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] KVM: arm64: nv: Publish emulated timer interrupt state in the in-memory state Marc Zyngier
2024-12-17 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: arm64: nv: Use FEAT_ECV to trap access to EL0 timers Marc Zyngier
2024-12-17 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] KVM: arm64: nv: Accelerate EL0 timer read accesses when FEAT_ECV in use Marc Zyngier
2024-12-17 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: arm64: nv: Accelerate EL0 counter accesses from hypervisor context Marc Zyngier
2024-12-17 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] KVM: arm64: Handle counter access early in non-HYP context Marc Zyngier
2024-12-17 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] KVM: arm64: nv: Add trap routing for CNTHCTL_EL2.EL1{NVPCT,NVVCT,TVT,TVCT} Marc Zyngier
2024-12-17 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: arm64: nv: Propagate CNTHCTL_EL2.EL1NV{P,V}CT bits Marc Zyngier
2025-01-06 2:33 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2025-01-17 15:19 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-01-21 6:04 ` Wei-Lin Chang
2024-12-17 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] KVM: arm64: nv: Sanitise CNTHCTL_EL2 Marc Zyngier
2024-12-17 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] KVM: arm64: Work around x1e's CNTVOFF_EL2 bogosity Marc Zyngier
2024-12-17 14:23 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: arm64: nv: Document EL2 timer API Marc Zyngier
2025-01-02 19:15 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] KVM: arm64: Add NV timer support Oliver Upton
2025-01-02 19:25 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87frl51tse.fsf@epam.com \
--to=volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com \
--cc=Dmytro_Terletskyi@epam.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=chase.conklin@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=eauger@redhat.com \
--cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).