linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	oliver.upton@linux.dev, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	ryan.roberts@arm.com, apopple@nvidia.com, rananta@google.com,
	yangyicong@hisilicon.com, v-songbaohua@oppo.com,
	yezhenyu2@huawei.com, yihyu@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: tlb: Fix TLBI RANGE operand
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 18:33:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87frw1rq1v.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d0b2f9d0-228f-488d-94b8-79f01f17e4e8@redhat.com>

On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 11:26:20 +0100,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> In summary, we need 3 patches but the one fixing __TLBI_RANGE_NUM needs to be
> PATCH[1/3] so that it can be easily picked by stable kernel. PATCH[2/3] would
> be to improve __TLBI_VADDR_RANGE with masks. PATCH[3/3] will allow __flush_tlb_range_nosync()
> to do range-based TLB flush for MAX_TLBI_RANGE_PAGES.

That's about it indeed.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-04 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-04  5:36 [PATCH v2] arm64: tlb: Fix TLBI RANGE operand Gavin Shan
2024-04-04  9:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-04 10:26   ` Gavin Shan
2024-04-04 17:33     ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2024-04-05  4:05       ` Gavin Shan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87frw1rq1v.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
    --cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=yezhenyu2@huawei.com \
    --cc=yihyu@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).