public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: PRM: fix compile for OMAP4-only build
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 17:07:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fwchhge4.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1204051533110.10302@utopia.booyaka.com> (Paul Walmsley's message of "Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:33:32 -0600 (MDT)")

Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> writes:

> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>
>> For OMAP4 only builds, the omap2_prm_* functions have dummy wrappers
>> to detect incorrect usage.  However, several unrelated omap3 PRM
>> functions have made it inside the #else clause of the #ifdef wrapping
>> the omap2_prm stubs, causing them to disappear on OMAP4-only builds.
>> 
>> This was unnoticed until the IO chain support was added and introduced
>> a new function in this section which is referenced by omap_hwmod.c:
>> 
>> /work/kernel/omap/dev/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c: In function '_reconfigure_io_chain':
>> /work/kernel/omap/dev/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c:1665:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'omap3xxx_prm_reconfigure_io_chain' [-Werror=implicit-fungiction-declaration]
>> 
>> Fix by using the #ifdef to only wrap the omap2_prm functions that
>> need stubs on OMAP4-only builds.
>> 
>> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Paul, this patch applies on top your io_chain_devel_3.5 branch.
>
> Thanks, Tony reported this too.  Any objections to me rolling this into 
> the offending patch?

No objections.

Kevin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-06  0:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-05 21:20 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: PRM: fix compile for OMAP4-only build Kevin Hilman
2012-04-05 21:33 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-05 22:53   ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-05 23:37     ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-06  0:07   ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-04-09 16:51     ` Paul Walmsley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fwchhge4.fsf@ti.com \
    --to=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox