From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0985DCA0FED for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 14:47:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=cx/cLzMdFwxZEfUZV5dGxlW5/VM8KOo9COoO8ANF8ms=; b=pmTdjp7ctFQ3t4uzn8dCZm76ah sVvZw7pU5PHakZ1316Avmze2pTjWIQEbR/PLRzY6kzAOJVp8UavqvSQxV2LKOlR2SI5A4r1vtFUcb wNxWnS9/sGCxV4FlIIMHqaA1gPHCh5xIYvn6pMnd6xZUg3PCARVHLIeMNeCuB9H/BXSJ6ThE3papP 7mtYQMHkT2jU23CQIgZPz2SsV+t3d6AzSj0rAoKnd/X+OFgwJ9X9rWrY7fNdjCEfqCEYCUuWoSY1J AT+OPMjp/Gj2GHwnpe1A7vf9QEGny0Tjz3Khw/tcpkmZplOFjMfAnFUXigaeVuE+z+YmzLidX2sWk zf8imjgw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uwM6G-0000000EqFc-1cDe; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 14:47:08 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uwM6C-0000000EqE5-3JNe for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 14:47:07 +0000 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1757515622; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=cx/cLzMdFwxZEfUZV5dGxlW5/VM8KOo9COoO8ANF8ms=; b=BTscDZbOpxt/U2TKqJdaOr1GCip/McoA8ZI8h8ly6noV7+Dd2N4nXQGhCwb+4YddUR0xLk WpzaV1D3GQYd84DvI+PvWHyomaCOhP3vxBTKqnkW34MnWocKFq4/V6sRzTfD0h/HcuaTc0 1aHxiQ1dY776Y8FLU4rEv1sJV/OELPo1U1ws7aEaxXrAm8BTX7RXCX1M3PlX3WHGPhJm6t GxqvcxGqUn27vgi02Ezw8K+SQBJwg9NKFHL/yEiGPiwpZzJbqFvGflO5pgcIIMZvOLZBqg IeOvgQqeUOYzQXuKoYThKPZjBFD2UFY3gu5D0Za9rD0KSwdjcOsRTQ0/iFSHwQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1757515622; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=cx/cLzMdFwxZEfUZV5dGxlW5/VM8KOo9COoO8ANF8ms=; b=gLeMKV+z5z7Eu3gocJslS196gaSHl3jMqoNzqO7evhJrjr8gHcw6/xN7fF/Y5RfwJHuWMZ k8IiifZXielclmDg== To: Marc Zyngier , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mark Rutland , Will Deacon , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rob Herring , Saravana Kannan , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sven Peter , Janne Grunau , Suzuki K Poulose , James Clark Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/25] genirq: Allow per-cpu interrupt sharing for non-overlapping affinities In-Reply-To: <86ecsed84s.wl-maz@kernel.org> References: <20250908163127.2462948-1-maz@kernel.org> <20250908163127.2462948-16-maz@kernel.org> <86ecsed84s.wl-maz@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 16:47:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87h5xatlei.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250910_074704_992158_9A98657D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.78 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Sep 10 2025 at 09:28, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Mon, 08 Sep 2025 17:31:17 +0100, > As Will points out off the list, the above lacks the a similar > handling for percpu_devid NMIs, leading to NMIs that are only handled > on the first affinity group. > > It's easy enough to move the above to common code and share it with > handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_nmi(), but at this point there is hardly > any difference with handle_percpu_devid_irq(). > > Any objection to simply killing the NMI version? Removing code is always appreciated :)