From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com>,
Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] genirq/msi: Add .msi_teardown() callback as the reverse of .msi_prepare()
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 16:29:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h61plx64.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250511163520.1307654-2-maz@kernel.org>
On Sun, May 11 2025 at 17:35, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> While the MSI ops do have a .msi_prepare() callback that is
> responsible for setting up the relevant (usually per-device)
> allocation, we don't have a callback reversing this setup.
..., there is no callback reversing ...
> For this purpose, let's a .msi_teardown() callback. This is
'let's a ...' is not a sentence. Just say: add a .... calback.
> reliying on the msi_domain_info structure having a non-NULL
^^^^^ spell check is your friend.
> alloc_data field.
>
> Nobody is populating this field yet, so there is no change
No driver is ..
>
> +static void msi_domain_ops_teardown(struct irq_domain *domain,
> + msi_alloc_info_t *arg)
No line break required.
> +{
> +}
> +
> static void msi_domain_ops_set_desc(msi_alloc_info_t *arg,
> struct msi_desc *desc)
> {
> @@ -821,6 +826,7 @@ static struct msi_domain_ops msi_domain_ops_default = {
> .get_hwirq = msi_domain_ops_get_hwirq,
> .msi_init = msi_domain_ops_init,
> .msi_prepare = msi_domain_ops_prepare,
> + .msi_teardown = msi_domain_ops_teardown,
> .set_desc = msi_domain_ops_set_desc,
> };
>
> @@ -842,6 +848,8 @@ static void msi_domain_update_dom_ops(struct msi_domain_info *info)
> ops->msi_init = msi_domain_ops_default.msi_init;
> if (ops->msi_prepare == NULL)
> ops->msi_prepare = msi_domain_ops_default.msi_prepare;
> + if (ops->msi_teardown == NULL)
> + ops->msi_teardown = msi_domain_ops_default.msi_teardown;
> if (ops->set_desc == NULL)
> ops->set_desc = msi_domain_ops_default.set_desc;
> }
> @@ -1088,6 +1096,10 @@ void msi_remove_device_irq_domain(struct device *dev, unsigned int domid)
>
> dev->msi.data->__domains[domid].domain = NULL;
> info = domain->host_data;
> +
> + if (info->alloc_data)
> + info->ops->msi_teardown(domain, info->alloc_data);
Hmm, that's weird.
Why not call it unconditionally. The empty teardown() default callback
does not care about @arg being NULL. No?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-12 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-11 16:35 [PATCH 0/4] genirq/msi: Fix device MSI prepare/alloc sequencing Marc Zyngier
2025-05-11 16:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] genirq/msi: Add .msi_teardown() callback as the reverse of .msi_prepare() Marc Zyngier
2025-05-12 14:29 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-05-12 15:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-05-12 18:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-05-11 16:35 ` [PATCH 2/4] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Implement .msi_teardown() callback Marc Zyngier
2025-05-12 14:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-05-12 16:09 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-05-12 18:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-05-12 16:30 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2025-05-12 17:00 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-05-11 16:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] genirq/msi: Move prepare() call to per-device allocation Marc Zyngier
2025-05-12 14:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-05-12 15:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-05-11 16:35 ` [PATCH 4/4] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Use allocation size from the prepare call Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h61plx64.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=sascha.bischoff@arm.com \
--cc=timothy.hayes@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox