Re: [PATCH 37/51] regulator: stm32-vrefbuf: Switch to __pm_runtime_put_autosuspend()

Mark Brown
2024-10-04T11:35:39Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 877 bytes --]

On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 12:41:34PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() will soon be changed to include a call to
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). This patch switches the current users to
> __pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() which will continue to have the
> functionality of old pm_runtime_put_autosuspend().

You've not copied me on the rest of the series so I don't know what's
going on with dependencies. When sending a patch series it is important
to ensure that all the various maintainers understand what the
relationship between the patches as the expecation is that there will be
interdependencies. Either copy everyone on the whole series or at least
copy them on the cover letter and explain what's going on. If there are
no strong interdependencies then it's generally simplest to just send
the patches separately to avoid any possible confusion.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]