From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 203F6C4829E for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 15:01:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Pr3irhO9JSHqqY+yt8E//i5BGT5SbvTU7hnTJxGL8wM=; b=JDrrnVvUFMCx9X r3NAzjb1bzXKbleBvDABeVq+grcSIXUUqYjaKuGNGsAV4748tbypac6POckdemmllDIClRZw50NSP H5OkUXoGAnyfvI4wi+w40BvuW1ooRZxy5mh1s/u6patKNg0dgo+QfuGPmLIxrLzPH6KZnFBbn70oK Mnl/XXLICXf7YIUVfFpQUoIm9MRL6/q3lr3ucar68/zUaYrj6NXL5Ynszs4SosiMtTbr/f/fAAJmO 5u0s2a3LgPxdFiAbXyDTbOjD+c72num+x8Ys4ZqWgFqxFzfDOdznGauyNomkQCrH3g3+2L+ifYlhm HjQ49J+ZdnQm4DycNmxw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1radEk-0000000GeRw-2EuK; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 15:01:18 +0000 Received: from galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1radEf-0000000GeLO-0ee4; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 15:01:17 +0000 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1708009264; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7jurcXevAzLq5b3XNHkngyd9aG7HXv/ajp+hOIdurHE=; b=ACCFDxP4M6h+kPZxC8n5YjerDJytE7XIB0xzvUQXXsvsgxPRymDCIwAOCzBTMwjF/tAC6G 5DClIsEIgMg8ovLCONa+WB3EEhNaR0do2/BXAHLP/kwTJWohwek+I2LO/AhhBv4naEVE0e aHQgbFkMm4aV/a+ICweO1zbPNB9N6AaJDpzcUIWsYMFaaN5tq4TzG4KtRQiOI3ZH5zRyML a3IJasqR/LwhLRPH+XRe6Jqq5lcpAy4rh9jyXmQL4Rc0PsGK3z88opG/4JIKCQLL2Mssf8 aa1w9c8EObkVpg4klvWcgi5NpujCCu6uXwJBtrkci69IOAL7y7ahvCT+XVT0PQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1708009264; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7jurcXevAzLq5b3XNHkngyd9aG7HXv/ajp+hOIdurHE=; b=KXqXpqo8rLP9B7h0qdTcwSs6/WBr1zOrw9q92FTDKvwl3twYREKP5rQvKTif3BtifKxCaI TvV5B162CoS6pGDQ== To: Marc Zyngier , Anup Patel Cc: Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Frank Rowand , Conor Dooley , =?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , Atish Patra , Andrew Jones , Sunil V L , Saravana Kannan , Anup Patel , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 04/25] genirq/irqdomain: Add DOMAIN_BUS_DEVICE_IMS In-Reply-To: <86o7ci3puk.wl-maz@kernel.org> References: <20240127161753.114685-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com> <20240127161753.114685-5-apatel@ventanamicro.com> <86o7ci3puk.wl-maz@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 16:01:03 +0100 Message-ID: <87h6i9epqo.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240215_070113_356950_7369D62F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.37 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Feb 15 2024 at 11:54, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Sat, 27 Jan 2024 16:17:32 +0000, > Anup Patel wrote: >> DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_DEVICE_IMS, >> + DOMAIN_BUS_DEVICE_IMS, > > Only a personal taste, but since we keep calling it "device MSI", > which it really is, I find it slightly odd to name the token > "DEVICE_IMS". > > From what I understand, IMS is PCIe specific. Platform (and by > extension device) MSI extends far beyond PCIe. So here, DEVICE_MSI > would make a lot more sense and avoid confusion. That's true, but I chose it intentionally because Interrupt Message Store (IMS) is a (PCI) device specific way to store the message contrary to PCI/MSI[-X] which has standardized storage. So my thought was that this exactly reflects what the platform device requires: device specific message store, aka DMS or DSMS :) > But hey, I don't have much skin in this game, and I can probably > mentally rotate the acronym... I have no strong opinion about it though. Thanks, tglx _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel