From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: eric@anholt.net (Eric Anholt) Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 11:51:51 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: extend Raspberry Pi entry In-Reply-To: <2fcb0690-861a-1b83-c6d5-dfdef03fa9ab@wwwdotorg.org> References: <736209d7-5310-ac2f-1ff7-928b978e665e@wwwdotorg.org> <87zii7xb66.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> <2fcb0690-861a-1b83-c6d5-dfdef03fa9ab@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <87h94dr8o8.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Stephen Warren writes: > On 01/31/2017 12:49 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: >> Stephen Warren writes: >> >>> On 01/29/2017 01:08 PM, Baruch Siach wrote: >>>> Add bcm2836 (Raspberry Pi 2) and bcm2837 (Raspberry Pi 3). >>> >>>> -BROADCOM BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE >>>> +BROADCOM BCM2835/BCM2836/BCM2837 ARM ARCHITECTURE >>> ... >>>> T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rpi/linux-rpi.git >>> >>> It would make sense to update that too, if Eric isn't using this. >>> However, that's a subject for a different patch perhaps. >>> >>> Acked-by: Stephen Warren >> >> Pulled this patch, sent a followup for the tree location. >> >> Thinking of MAINTAINERS, I was wondering if you and Lee were both still >> interested in being on the list? > > To be honest, I was thinking about sending a patch to remove myself > since you've been taking care of everything well and I've been too lazy > to do anything RPi related recently. Sounds good. I've been mulling over a couple of ideas about bcm2835 maintainership of the tree since LCA: one is asking Florian if he'd like me to just be a co-maintainer with a limited role within the stblinux tree (bcm2835 is pretty low traffic, I don't see the need for a separate tree), and the other is picking up one of the more active current Pi developers as a co-maintainer within the current tree. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 832 bytes Desc: not available URL: