From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, mingo@redhat.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, john.ogness@linutronix.de,
senozhatsky@chromium.org, pmladek@suse.com, peterz@infradead.org,
mojha@qti.qualcomm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, konradybcio@kernel.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
andersson@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 09/14] genirq: add irq_kmemdump_register
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 23:10:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ikkzpcup.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f916cf7f-6d0d-4d31-8e4b-24fc7da13f4d@linaro.org>
On Fri, Jun 13 2025 at 17:33, Eugen Hristev wrote:
> On 5/7/25 13:27, Eugen Hristev wrote:
>>> Let KMEMDUMP_VAR() store the size and the address of 'nr_irqs' in a
>>> kmemdump specific section and then kmemdump can just walk that section
>>> and dump stuff. No magic register functions and no extra storage
>>> management for static/global variables.
>>>
>>> No?
>>
>> Thank you very much for your review ! I will try it out.
>
> I have tried this way and it's much cleaner ! thanks for the
> suggestion.
Welcome.
> The thing that I am trying to figure out now is how to do something
> similar for a dynamically allocated memory, e.g.
> void *p = kmalloc(...);
> and then I can annotate `p` itself, it's address and size, but what I
> would also want to so dump the whole memory region pointed out by p. and
> that area address and size cannot be figured out at compile time hence I
> can't instantiate a struct inside the dedicated section for it.
> Any suggestion on how to make that better ? Or just keep the function
> call to register the area into kmemdump ?
Right. For dynamically allocated memory there is obviously no compile
time magic possible.
But I think you can simplify the registration for dynamically allocated
memory significantly.
struct kmemdump_entry {
void *ptr;
size_t size;
enum kmemdump_uids uid;
};
You use that layout for the compile time table and the runtime
registrations.
I intentionally used an UID as that avoids string allocation and all of
the related nonsense. Mapping UID to a string is a post processing
problem and really does not need to be done in the kernel. The 8
character strings are horribly limited and a simple 4 byte unique id is
achieving the same and saving space.
Just stick the IDs into include/linux/kmemdump_ids.h and expose the
content for the post processing machinery.
So you want KMEMDUMP_VAR() for the compile time created table to either
automatically create that ID derived from the variable name or you add
an extra argument with the ID.
kmemdump_init()
// Use a simple fixed size array to manage this
// as it avoids all the memory allocation nonsense
// This stuff is neither performance critical nor does allocating
// a few hundred entries create a memory consumption problem
// It consumes probably way less memory than the whole IDR/XARRAY allocation
// string duplication logic consumes text and data space.
kmemdump_entries = kcalloc(NR_ENTRIES, sizeof(*kmemdump_entries), GFP_KERNEL);
kmemdump_register(void *ptr, size_t size, enum kmemdump_uids uid)
{
guard(entry_mutex);
entry = kmemdump_find_empty_slot();
if (!entry)
return;
entry->ptr = ptr;
entry->size = size;
entry->uid = uid;
// Make this unconditional by providing a dummy backend
// implementation. If the backend changes re-register all
// entries with the new backend and be done with it.
backend->register(entry);
}
kmemdump_unregister(void *ptr)
{
guard(entry_mutex);
entry = find_entry(ptr);
if (entry) {
backend->unregister(entry);
memset(entry, 0, sizeof(*entry);
}
}
You get the idea.
Coming back to the registration at the call site itself.
struct foo = kmalloc(....);
if (!foo)
return;
kmemdump_register(foo, sizeof(*foo), KMEMDUMP_ID_FOO);
That's a code duplication shitshow. You can wrap that into:
struct foo *foo = kmemdump_alloc(foo, KMEMDUMP_ID_FOO, kmalloc, ...);
#define kmemdump_alloc(var, id, fn, ...) \
({ \
void *__p = fn(##__VA_ARGS__); \
\
if (__p) \
kmemdump_register(__p, sizeof(*var), id); \
__p;
})
or something daft like that. And provide the matching magic for the free
side.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-13 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-22 11:31 [RFC][PATCH 00/14] introduce kmemdump Eugen Hristev
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/14] Documentation: add kmemdump Eugen Hristev
2025-05-09 17:31 ` Trilok Soni
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/14] kmemdump: introduce kmemdump Eugen Hristev
2025-05-09 22:38 ` Bjorn Andersson
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/14] kmemdump: introduce qcom-md backend driver Eugen Hristev
2025-05-09 23:21 ` Bjorn Andersson
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/14] soc: qcom: smem: add minidump device Eugen Hristev
2025-05-07 16:56 ` Bjorn Andersson
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/14] Documentation: kmemdump: add section for coreimage ELF Eugen Hristev
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/14] kmemdump: add coreimage ELF layer Eugen Hristev
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/14] printk: add kmsg_kmemdump_register Eugen Hristev
2025-05-05 15:25 ` Petr Mladek
2025-05-05 15:51 ` Eugen Hristev
2025-05-06 7:24 ` Petr Mladek
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/14] kmemdump: coreimage: add kmsg registration Eugen Hristev
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/14] genirq: add irq_kmemdump_register Eugen Hristev
2025-05-07 10:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-05-07 10:27 ` Eugen Hristev
2025-06-13 14:33 ` Eugen Hristev
2025-06-13 21:10 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-06-16 10:12 ` Eugen Hristev
2025-06-17 8:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/14] kmemdump: coreimage: add irq registration Eugen Hristev
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/14] panic: add panic_kmemdump_register Eugen Hristev
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/14] kmemdump: coreimage: add panic registration Eugen Hristev
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 13/14] sched: add sched_kmemdump_register Eugen Hristev
2025-04-22 11:31 ` [RFC][PATCH 14/14] kmemdump: coreimage: add sched registration Eugen Hristev
2025-04-23 7:04 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/14] introduce kmemdump Trilok Soni
2025-05-07 16:54 ` Bjorn Andersson
2025-05-09 15:19 ` Eugen Hristev
2025-06-02 8:46 ` Eugen Hristev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ikkzpcup.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=eugen.hristev@linaro.org \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mojha@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).