From: Frank Oltmanns <frank@oltmanns.dev>
To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
Roman Beranek <me@crly.cz>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/11] clk: sunxi-ng: nkm: Support finding closest rate
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2023 09:25:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ilabqecp.fsf@oltmanns.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ho2bblo2hzizst74hfqog3ga4cjf7eead2ntbl4e7xi5c32bhq@qpttu7ayv7vy>
Hi Maxime,
On 2023-07-17 at 16:14:58 +0200, Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> wrote:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 03:34:32PM +0200, Frank Oltmanns wrote:
>> When finding the best rate for a NKM clock, consider rates that are
>> higher than the requested rate, if the CCU_FEATURE_CLOSEST_RATE flag is
>> set by using the helper function ccu_is_better_rate().
>>
>> Accommodate ccu_mux_helper_determine_rate to this change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frank Oltmanns <frank@oltmanns.dev>
>> ---
>> drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_mux.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c | 18 ++++++++----------
>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_mux.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_mux.c
>> index 1d557e323169..3ca695439620 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_mux.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_mux.c
>> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ int ccu_mux_helper_determine_rate(struct ccu_common *common,
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> - if ((req->rate - tmp_rate) < (req->rate - best_rate)) {
>> + if (ccu_is_better_rate(common, req->rate, tmp_rate, best_rate)) {
>> best_rate = tmp_rate;
>> best_parent_rate = parent_rate;
>> best_parent = parent;
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
>> index 793160bc2d47..5439b9351cd7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkm_optimal_parent_rate(unsigned long rate, unsigned lo
>> }
>>
>> static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best_with_parent_adj(struct clk_hw *phw, struct _ccu_nkm *nkm,
>> + struct ccu_common *common,
>> unsigned long *parent, unsigned long rate)
>> {
>> unsigned long best_rate = 0, best_parent_rate = *parent, tmp_parent = *parent;
>> @@ -54,10 +55,8 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best_with_parent_adj(struct clk_hw *phw, struc
>> tmp_parent = clk_hw_round_rate(phw, tmp_parent);
>>
>> tmp_rate = tmp_parent * _n * _k / _m;
>> - if (tmp_rate > rate)
>> - continue;
>>
>> - if ((rate - tmp_rate) < (rate - best_rate)) {
>> + if (ccu_is_better_rate(common, rate, tmp_rate, best_rate)) {
>> best_rate = tmp_rate;
>> best_parent_rate = tmp_parent;
>> best_n = _n;
>> @@ -78,7 +77,7 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best_with_parent_adj(struct clk_hw *phw, struc
>> }
>>
>> static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best(unsigned long parent, unsigned long rate,
>> - struct _ccu_nkm *nkm)
>> + struct _ccu_nkm *nkm, struct ccu_common *common)
>
> Same comment than on patch 7, common should be first in those two functions.
>
Ok, I wasn't sure what your expectation is for existing functions. For
ccu_find_best_with_parent_adj the order is:
1. *phw
2. *nkm
3. *common
4. *parent
5. rate
We don't have the parent hw in ccu_nkm_find_best. The order prior to
this patch is:
1. parent
2. rate
3. *nkm
We need to add *common to that, so I could add it to the beginning as
per your suggestion:
1. *common
2. parent
3. rate
4. *nkm
I could also pull *nkm to the beginning (similar to the parent_adj
version):
4. *nkm
1. *common
2. parent
3. rate
Thanks for your feedback,
Frank
>
> Once fixed,
> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
>
> Maxime
>
> [[End of PGP Signed Part]]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-23 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-17 13:34 [PATCH v4 00/11] clk: sunxi-ng: Consider alternative parent rates when determining NKM clock rate Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-17 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] clk: sunxi-ng: nkm: Use correct parameter name for parent HW Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-17 14:07 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-17 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] clk: sunxi-ng: nkm: consider alternative parent rates when determining rate Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-17 14:07 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-17 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] clk: sunxi-ng: nkm: Improve determine rate when setting parent Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-17 14:10 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-17 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] clk: sunxi-ng: a64: allow pll-mipi to set parent's rate Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-17 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] clk: sunxi-ng: Add feature to find closest rate Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-17 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] clk: sunxi-ng: Add helper function " Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-17 14:08 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-17 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] clk: sunxi-ng: nm: Support finding " Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-17 14:12 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-23 7:26 ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-17 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] clk: sunxi-ng: nkm: " Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-17 14:14 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-23 7:25 ` Frank Oltmanns [this message]
2023-07-17 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] clk: sunxi-ng: mux: " Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-17 14:15 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-07-17 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] clk: sunxi-ng: div: " Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-17 13:34 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] clk: sunxi-ng: a64: select closest rate for pll-video0 Frank Oltmanns
2023-07-17 14:16 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ilabqecp.fsf@oltmanns.dev \
--to=frank@oltmanns.dev \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=me@crly.cz \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).