linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] KVM: arm64: Only return attributes from stage2_update_leaf_attrs()
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 08:52:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ilhde9me.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230111000300.2034799-4-oliver.upton@linux.dev>

[+ Suzuki and Zenghui who are missing from the Cc list]

On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 00:02:58 +0000,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> wrote:
> 
> Returning a single PTE from stage2_update_leaf_attrs() doesn't make a
> great deal of sense given that the function could be used to apply a
> change to a range of PTEs. Instead, return a bitwise OR of attributes
> from all the visited PTEs.

I find this amalgamation of attributes quite confusing, and I have a
hard time attaching semantics to the resulting collection of bits.

It also means that you cannot reason about a particular attribute
being 0 if any of the neighbour PTEs has this bit set.

> 
> As the walker is no longer returning the full PTE, drop the check for a
> valid PTE in kvm_age_gfn().

But then what does it mean to check for a potentially invalid PTE?

The helpers explicitly say:

/*
 * The following only work if pte_present(). Undefined behaviour otherwise.
 */
#define pte_present(pte)	(!!(pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_PROT_NONE)))
#define pte_young(pte)		(!!(pte_val(pte) & PTE_AF))

and you seem to be violating this requirement.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-11  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-11  0:02 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: arm64: Handle unaligned memslots in kvm_(test_)_age_gfn() Oliver Upton
2023-01-11  0:02 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: arm64: Hoist S2 PTE definitions into kvm_pgtable.h Oliver Upton
2023-01-11  0:02 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: arm64: Add a mask for all leaf PTE attributes Oliver Upton
2023-01-11  0:02 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: arm64: Only return attributes from stage2_update_leaf_attrs() Oliver Upton
2023-01-11  8:52   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-01-11 17:21     ` Oliver Upton
2023-02-02 22:08       ` Oliver Upton
2023-02-07 14:56         ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-11  0:02 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: arm64: Correctly handle page aging notifiers for unaligned memlsot Oliver Upton
2023-01-12 15:44   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-11  0:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: arm64: Consistently use KVM's types/helpers in kvm_age_gfn() Oliver Upton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ilhde9me.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=reijiw@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).