From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: robert.jarzmik@free.fr (Robert Jarzmik)
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 20:48:53 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: ezx: fix a910 camera data
In-Reply-To: <20161124162955.3887066-1-arnd@arndb.de> (Arnd Bergmann's message
 of "Thu, 24 Nov 2016 17:29:18 +0100")
References: <20161124162955.3887066-1-arnd@arndb.de>
Message-ID: <87inrbqr16.fsf@belgarion.home>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:

> The camera_supply_dummy_device definition is shared between a780 and a910,
> but only provided when the first is enabled and fails to build for a
> configuration with only a910:
>
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/ezx.c:1097:3: error: 'camera_supply_dummy_device' undeclared here (not in a function)
>
> This moves the definition into its own section.
>
> Fixes: 6c1b417adc8f ("ARM: pxa: ezx: use the new pxa_camera platform_data")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Ah yes, I'll queue that up in pxa/fixes.

This also means that you have a test robot which beats my Jenkins, as mine
didn't complain. Do you have a specific defconfig or is it a randconfig which
reveals that ?

Cheers.

--
Robert