From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kvalo@codeaurora.org (Kalle Valo) Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 11:02:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] wlcore/wl12xx: spi: add wifi support to cm-t335 In-Reply-To: <1451482533-8624-4-git-send-email-uri.mashiach@compulab.co.il> (Uri Mashiach's message of "Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:35:33 +0200") References: <1451482533-8624-1-git-send-email-uri.mashiach@compulab.co.il> <1451482533-8624-4-git-send-email-uri.mashiach@compulab.co.il> Message-ID: <87io35lq2p.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Uri Mashiach writes: > Device tree modifications: > - Pinmux for SPI0 and WiFi GPIOs. > - SPI0 node with wlcore as a child node. > > Cc: Tony Lindgren > Signed-off-by: Uri Mashiach > --- > v1 -> v2: Replace interrupts and interrupt-parent with interrupts-extended. > v2 -> v3: Move the pinctrl-0 = <&wifi_pins> to the wlcore node. > v3 -> v4: replace interrupts-extended with interrupts and interrupt-parent. (revert v2 modification). > According to Rob Herring and Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt, > interrupts-extended should only be used when a device has multiple interrupt parents. > > arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-cm-t335.dts | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) To what tree should this patch go? My wireless-drivers-next tree doesn't even have this file. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7933441/ -- Kalle Valo