From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: robert.jarzmik@free.fr (Robert Jarzmik) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 21:38:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v5 1/3] ARM: pxa: pxa_cplds: add lubbock and mainstone IO In-Reply-To: <1430075422.2927.131.camel@x220> (Paul Bolle's message of "Sun, 26 Apr 2015 21:10:22 +0200") References: <1429996403-13644-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> <1429996403-13644-2-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> <1430075422.2927.131.camel@x220> Message-ID: <87iocillxd.fsf@belgarion.home> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Paul Bolle writes: > On Sat, 2015-04-25 at 23:13 +0200, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/Kconfig > >> +config PXA_SYSTEMS_CPLDS >> + bool "Motherboard cplds" >> + def_bool ARCH_LUBBOCK || MACH_MAINSTONE > > Just > default ARCH_LUBBOCK || MACH_MAINSTONE > > should be enough. Actually this will become a tristate, and I'll take your "default" suggestion. For v2. >> + select MFD_CORE Ah this is an oversight now I see it. In the move from drivers/mfd to arch/arm I forgot to remove this. For v2 also. >> + help >> + This driver supports the Lubbock and Mainstone multifunction chip >> + found on the pxa25x development platform system (Lubbock) and pxa27x >> + development platform system (Mainstone). This IO board supports the >> + interrupts handling, ethernet controller, flash chips, etc ... > >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/Makefile >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/Makefile > >> +obj-$(CONFIG_PXA_SYSTEMS_CPLDS) += pxa_cplds_irqs.o > > PXA_SYSTEMS_CPLDS is a bool symbol, so pxa_cplds_irqs.o will never be > part of a module, correct? Euh no, this another mistake of mine, it should capable of being a module, to enable the lubbock/mainstone generic device tree support. I'll fix that for v2 also. I removed the below comments as the built-in is an error of mine. Thanks for the review Paul. Cheers. -- Robert