From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: arm64: Don't WARN from __pkvm_host_share_guest()
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 18:02:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jz9d299h.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250225015327.3708420-3-qperret@google.com>
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 01:53:25 +0000,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> wrote:
>
> We currently WARN() if the host attempts to share a page that is not in
> an acceptable state with a guest. This isn't strictly necessary and
> makes testing much harder, so drop the WARN and fix the error code.
Are you really fixing the error code? You still seem to return a
-EPERM. I guess this was never reachable thanks to WARN() being a
panic with pKVM?
M.
>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
> index 19c3c631708c..ae39abc7e604 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
> @@ -912,7 +912,6 @@ int __pkvm_host_share_guest(u64 pfn, u64 gfn, struct pkvm_hyp_vcpu *vcpu,
> if (page->host_share_guest_count)
> break;
> /* Only host to np-guest multi-sharing is tolerated */
> - WARN_ON(1);
> fallthrough;
> default:
> ret = -EPERM;
> --
> 2.48.1.658.g4767266eb4-goog
>
>
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-25 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-25 1:53 [PATCH v2 0/4] Selftest for pKVM ownership transitions Quentin Perret
2025-02-25 1:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: arm64: Add .hyp.data section Quentin Perret
2025-02-25 1:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: arm64: Don't WARN from __pkvm_host_share_guest() Quentin Perret
2025-02-25 18:02 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2025-02-25 19:49 ` Quentin Perret
2025-02-26 14:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-02-25 1:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: arm64: Selftest for pKVM transitions Quentin Perret
2025-02-26 14:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-02-26 18:10 ` Quentin Perret
2025-02-25 1:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: arm64: Extend pKVM selftest for np-guests Quentin Perret
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87jz9d299h.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).