From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org (Arnaud Patard (Rtp)) Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:58:33 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/6] mv643xx.c: Add basic device tree support. In-Reply-To: <50179B31.1000202@codethink.co.uk> (Ian Molton's message of "Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:45:37 +0100") References: <1343661359-10150-1-git-send-email-ian.molton@codethink.co.uk> <1343661359-10150-4-git-send-email-ian.molton@codethink.co.uk> <87obmw5rm9.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org> <50179528.2020801@codethink.co.uk> <20120731082742.GU18016@lunn.ch> <50179B31.1000202@codethink.co.uk> Message-ID: <87k3xk5mti.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Ian Molton writes: > On 31/07/12 09:27, Andrew Lunn wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:19:52AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote: >>> Are you sure this is required? It can always be added if anything >>> actually uses it :) >> Hi Ian >> >> Try using jumbo packets on kirkwood. >> >> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/178785 >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg186152.html > > Ah, this postdates the D-T branches on which I am working being forked. the original patch was from years ago but I noticed only recently it was still not merged and sent this patch. I asked about it on DT because I don't want it to get lost again, even if it looks like not a lot of people are using jumbo frames on kirkwood or dove. > > I'll fold this into my patchset. Thanks, Arnaud