From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: Convert Marvell CP110 System Controller to DT schema
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 16:11:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ldl3rpp7.fsf@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251014153021.3783485-1-robh@kernel.org> (Rob Herring's message of "Tue, 14 Oct 2025 10:30:19 -0500")
Hi Rob,
Thanks for the conversion!
On 14/10/2025 at 10:30:19 -05, "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> Convert the Marvell CP110 System Controller binding to DT schema
> format.
>
> There's not any specific compatible for the whole block which is a
> separate problem, so just the child nodes are documented. Only the
> pinctrl and clock child nodes need to be converted as the GPIO node
> already has a schema.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
...
> -Those clocks can be referenced by other Device Tree nodes using two
> -cells:
> - - The first cell must be 0 or 1. 0 for the core clocks and 1 for the
> - gateable clocks.
> - - The second cell identifies the particular core clock or gateable
> - clocks.
> -
> -The following clocks are available:
> - - Core clocks
> - - 0 0 APLL
> - - 0 1 PPv2 core
> - - 0 2 EIP
> - - 0 3 Core
> - - 0 4 NAND core
> - - 0 5 SDIO core
> - - Gateable clocks
> - - 1 0 Audio
> - - 1 1 Comm Unit
> - - 1 2 NAND
> - - 1 3 PPv2
> - - 1 4 SDIO
...
Why do you want to drop this information? Telling
#clock-cells = <2>
is not enough IMO, we must tell people what is expected in these
cells. At the very least the cell values can be constrained to [0-1] for the first
one and [0-5] or [0-26] respectively for the second one.
But giving their meaning I think makes sense. I agree, these should have been
defined inside a shared header, that would have been a better way to
keep track of their meaning, but if we don't have that, I would propose
to keep the information here?
[...]
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/marvell,armada-7k-pinctrl.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pinctrl/marvell,armada-7k-pinctrl.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Marvell Armada 7K/8K pin controller
...
> + enum: [
> + au, dev, ge, ge0, ge1, gpio, i2c0, i2c1, io, led, link,
> mii,
I don't think "io" has ever been a valid value, it probably comes from a
typo while sorting out all the possibilities ;-) (probably a left over
of a gpio, mdio or sdio string).
> + mss_gpio0, mss_gpio1, mss_gpio2, mss_gpio3, mss_gpio4, mss_gpio5,
> + mss_gpio6, mss_gpio7, mss_i2c, mss_spi, mss_uart, nf, pcie, pcie0,
> + pcie1, pcie2, ptp, rei, sata0, sata1, sdio, sdio_cd, sdio_wp, sei,
> + spi0, spi1, synce1, synce2, tdm, uart0, uart1, uart2, uart3, wakeup,
> + xg
Rest LGTM otherwise.
Thanks,
Miquèl
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-22 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-14 15:30 [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: Convert Marvell CP110 System Controller to DT schema Rob Herring (Arm)
2025-10-22 14:11 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ldl3rpp7.fsf@bootlin.com \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).