From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, peterx@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net, james.morse@arm.com,
alexandru.elisei@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
oliver.upton@linux.dev, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
shuah@kernel.org, seanjc@google.com, drjones@redhat.com,
dmatlack@google.com, bgardon@google.com, ricarkol@google.com,
zhenyzha@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] KVM: arm64: Enable ring-based dirty memory tracking
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 09:00:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lerkwtm5.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220819005601.198436-2-gshan@redhat.com>
On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 01:55:57 +0100,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> The ring-based dirty memory tracking has been available and enabled
> on x86 for a while. The feature is beneficial when the number of
> dirty pages is small in a checkpointing system or live migration
> scenario. More details can be found from fb04a1eddb1a ("KVM: X86:
> Implement ring-based dirty memory tracking").
>
> This enables the ring-based dirty memory tracking on ARM64. It's
> notable that no extra reserved ring entries are needed on ARM64
> because the huge pages are always split into base pages when page
> dirty tracking is enabled.
Can you please elaborate on this? Adding a per-CPU ring of course
results in extra memory allocation, so there must be a subtle
x86-specific detail that I'm not aware of...
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> ---
> Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 8 ++++++++
> 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> index abd7c32126ce..19fa1ac017ed 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> @@ -8022,7 +8022,7 @@ regardless of what has actually been exposed through the CPUID leaf.
> 8.29 KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING
> ---------------------------
>
> -:Architectures: x86
> +:Architectures: x86, arm64
> :Parameters: args[0] - size of the dirty log ring
>
> KVM is capable of tracking dirty memory using ring buffers that are
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 3bb134355874..7e04b0b8d2b2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
> #define __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS
>
> #define KVM_COALESCED_MMIO_PAGE_OFFSET 1
> +#define KVM_DIRTY_LOG_PAGE_OFFSET 64
For context, the documentation says:
<quote>
- if KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING is available, a number of pages at
KVM_DIRTY_LOG_PAGE_OFFSET * PAGE_SIZE. [...]
</quote>
What is the reason for picking this particular value?
>
> #define KVM_REG_SIZE(id) \
> (1U << (((id) & KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK) >> KVM_REG_SIZE_SHIFT))
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> index 815cc118c675..0309b2d0f2da 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ menuconfig KVM
> select KVM_VFIO
> select HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD
> select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
> + select HAVE_KVM_DIRTY_RING
> select HAVE_KVM_MSI
> select HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP
> select HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 986cee6fbc7f..3de6b9b39db7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -866,6 +866,14 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (!ret)
> ret = 1;
>
> + /* Force vcpu exit if its dirty ring is soft-full */
> + if (unlikely(vcpu->kvm->dirty_ring_size &&
> + kvm_dirty_ring_soft_full(&vcpu->dirty_ring))) {
> + vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DIRTY_RING_FULL;
> + trace_kvm_dirty_ring_exit(vcpu);
> + ret = 0;
> + }
> +
Why can't this be moved to kvm_vcpu_exit_request() instead? I would
also very much like the check to be made a common helper with x86.
A seemingly approach would be to make this a request on dirty log
insertion, and avoid the whole "check the log size" on every run,
which adds pointless overhead to unsuspecting users (aka everyone).
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-19 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-19 0:55 [PATCH v1 0/5] KVM: arm64: Enable ring-based dirty memory tracking Gavin Shan
2022-08-19 0:55 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] " Gavin Shan
2022-08-19 8:00 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-08-22 1:58 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-22 18:55 ` Peter Xu
2022-08-23 3:19 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-22 21:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-23 5:22 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-23 13:58 ` Peter Xu
2022-08-23 19:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-23 21:20 ` Peter Xu
2022-08-23 22:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-23 23:19 ` Peter Xu
2022-08-24 14:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-24 16:21 ` Peter Xu
2022-08-24 20:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-26 6:05 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-26 10:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-26 15:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-27 8:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-23 14:44 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-23 20:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-26 10:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-26 15:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-30 14:42 ` Peter Xu
2022-09-02 0:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-19 0:55 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] KVM: selftests: Use host page size to map ring buffer in dirty_log_test Gavin Shan
2022-08-19 0:55 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] KVM: selftests: Dirty host pages " Gavin Shan
2022-08-19 5:28 ` Andrew Jones
2022-08-22 6:29 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-23 3:09 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-19 0:56 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] KVM: selftests: Clear dirty ring states between two modes " Gavin Shan
2022-08-19 0:56 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] KVM: selftests: Automate choosing dirty ring size " Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lerkwtm5.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhenyzha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).