From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: punit.agrawal@arm.com (Punit Agrawal) Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 17:02:43 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: Use __tlbi() macros in KVM code In-Reply-To: <20170127135306.GK21144@arm.com> (Will Deacon's message of "Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:53:07 +0000") References: <20170125155232.10277-1-cov@codeaurora.org> <20170125155232.10277-3-cov@codeaurora.org> <20170125193943.GW15850@cbox> <20170127135306.GK21144@arm.com> Message-ID: <87lgtprgi4.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Will Deacon writes: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:39:43PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:52:31AM -0500, Christopher Covington wrote: >> > Refactor the KVM code to use the __tlbi macros, which will allow an errata >> > workaround that repeats tlbi dsb sequences to only change one location. >> > This is not intended to change the generated assembly and comparing before >> > and after vmlinux objdump shows no functional changes. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington >> >> Acked-by: Christoffer Dall > > Thanks, I'll queue this one via arm64. I just noticed this patch but there's been a similar patch from Mark that I've been carrying as part of the KVM TLB monitoring series[0]. [0] http://www.mail-archive.com/kvmarm at lists.cs.columbia.edu/msg09359.html > > Will > _______________________________________________ > kvmarm mailing list > kvmarm at lists.cs.columbia.edu > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm