From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arno@natisbad.org (Arnaud Ebalard) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:28:47 +0200 Subject: [PATCHv1 1/3] hwmon: Add support for GMT G762/G763 PWM fan controller In-Reply-To: <20130424133856.GA18851@roeck-us.net> (Guenter Roeck's message of "Wed, 24 Apr 2013 06:38:56 -0700") References: <63961d39aee9db94767f28fd441312bec2029473.1366753420.git.arno@natisbad.org> <20130424053758.GC8710@lunn.ch> <87obd4wb4e.fsf@natisbad.org> <20130424133856.GA18851@roeck-us.net> Message-ID: <87li878ygw.fsf@natisbad.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, Guenter Roeck writes: >> > You could consider using regmap for holding this cache. >> > >> > http://elceurope2012.sched.org/event/100619b669ce5767341624253aa03659?iframe=no&w=900&sidebar=yes&bg=no#.UXdspHLQ5jM >> > >> > http://elinux.org/ELCE_Europe_2012_Presentations >> >> Interesting. As I am not yet familiar w/ regmap I would prefer having >> the driver accepted during merge window with current data structure and >> then convert it to regmap. But I will take a look (e.g. will study >> fca1dd03 for instance). Thanks for the pointers. >> > I have not had time for a detailed review, but adding regmap support > will not be a requirement. > > Note that it is too late for 3.10, so the driver will have to wait for > 3.11. Well, I think I can live with it; The only bad thing is that it kills my excuses not to spend time on regmap ;-) >> >> +/* >> >> + * Helpers to import hardware characteristics from .dts file and overload >> >> + * default config values. >> >> + */ >> >> + >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF >> > >> > Can the driver be used without device tree? Would it be simpler to >> > just add depends OF in the Kconfig entry? >> >> It can be used if the default params (or those configured by u-boot I >> guess) fit your needs. I think it would be fairly easy to extend the >> driver later to expose g762_config struct to allow parameters to be set >> w/o using OF. If someone wants to do that, I think it is better to not >> depend on OF in Kconfig at the moment but I have not strong argument >> other that that one. I'll let you decide. >> > Agreed. As long as there are major platforms not supporting device tree, > and as long as device tree overlays are not supported, it must not be made > mandatory. Especially for I2C and SPI devices I reserve the right to be able > test the hardware on an X86 system and not require a reboot to do so. Understood. Following Simon's post, I think it's useful to implement some init function for non DT-enabled platforms. a+