From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org (Arnaud Patard (Rtp)) Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 09:24:31 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: mx51: Print silicon revision on boot In-Reply-To: <1299114747-14091-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com> (Fabio Estevam's message of "Wed, 2 Mar 2011 22:12:27 -0300") References: <1299114747-14091-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com> Message-ID: <87lj0wwr0g.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Fabio Estevam writes: Hi, > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam Why I like having boot log, I don't like have too verbose boot logs. If you add this, you have a good reason (I hope), but I can't know it. There's no patch description. So, please give a patch with proper explanation of why you need that. Anyway, having a proper patch description is imho always a good idea. Moreover, there's already good hint if you want to know if you're on to2 or to3. On rev < 3.0, you have this in logs: VFP support v0.3: implementor 41 architecture 3 part 30 variant c rev 2 Turning off NEON support, detected broken NEON implementation Arnaud