From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Maulik Shah <quic_mkshah@quicinc.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: smp: Implement cpus_has_pending_ipi()
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 16:01:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ms5pzkxa.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251003150251.520624-3-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
On Fri, Oct 03 2025 at 17:02, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Note, the implementation is intentionally lightweight and doesn't use
> any
By some definition of lightweight.
> static void smp_cross_call(const struct cpumask *target, unsigned int ipinr)
> {
> + unsigned int cpu;
> +
> + for_each_cpu(cpu, target)
> + per_cpu(pending_ipi, cpu) = true;
Iterating over a full cpumask on a big system is not necessarily
considered lightweight. And that comes on top of the loop in
smp_call_function_many_cond() plus the potential loop in
arm64_send_ipi()...
None of this is actually needed. If you want a lightweight racy check
whether there is an IPI en route to a set of CPUs then you can simply do
that in kernel/smp.c:
bool smp_pending_ipis_crystalball(mask)
{
for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
if (!llist_empty(per_cpu_ptr(&call_single_queue, cpu)))
return true;
}
return false;
}
No?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-17 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-03 15:02 [PATCH 0/3] pmdomain: Improve idlestate selection for CPUs Ulf Hansson
2025-10-03 15:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] smp: Introduce a weak helper function to check for pending IPIs Ulf Hansson
2025-10-03 15:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: smp: Implement cpus_has_pending_ipi() Ulf Hansson
2025-10-06 10:54 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-10-06 12:22 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-10-06 14:41 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-10-10 8:03 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-10-06 15:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-10-10 8:30 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-10-10 9:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-10-10 9:55 ` Mark Rutland
2025-10-17 14:01 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-10-20 13:15 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-10-03 15:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] pmdomain: Extend the genpd governor for CPUs to account for IPIs Ulf Hansson
2025-10-06 15:36 ` [PATCH 0/3] pmdomain: Improve idlestate selection for CPUs Sudeep Holla
2025-10-10 7:52 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ms5pzkxa.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=quic_mkshah@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).