From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ben@smart-cactus.org (Ben Gamari) Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 22:19:05 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v5 0/12] cpufreq: Add support for Exynos 5800, 5420, and 5422 In-Reply-To: <20151203103703.GC2097@ubuntu> References: <1449091167-20758-1-git-send-email-ben@smart-cactus.org> <20151203060527.GH4302@ubuntu> <877fkv4ylk.fsf@smart-cactus.org> <20151203103703.GC2097@ubuntu> Message-ID: <87mvtm9cty.fsf@smart-cactus.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Viresh Kumar writes: > On 03-12-15, 11:26, Ben Gamari wrote: >> Sounds reasonable to me. However, I'd just like to reiterate that this >> line of work can be pursued independently from the upstreaming of this >> series. > > I think this is the right time to upstream the right solution. Just > try it once, if you face lots of difficulties or issues, then we can > ofcourse see.. > It looks like Bartlomiej has picked up this set. Regardless, while tracking down various devicetree issues I noticed that the cpu-supply and cpu%d-supply bindings appear to be completely undocumented. It seem as though this ought to be fixed. Cheers, - Ben -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 472 bytes Desc: not available URL: