From: khilman@linaro.org (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: add fail hook for runtime_pm when bad data is detected
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 08:06:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mwka80vu.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131205190343.GI26766@atomide.com> (Tony Lindgren's message of "Thu, 5 Dec 2013 11:03:43 -0800")
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> writes:
> * Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> [131203 17:40]:
>> Due to the cross dependencies between hwmod for automanaged device
>> information for OMAP and dts node definitions, we can run into scenarios
>> where the dts node is defined, however it's hwmod entry is yet to be
>> added. In these cases:
>> a) omap_device does not register a pm_domain (since it cannot find
>> hwmod entry).
>> b) driver does not know about (a), does a pm_runtime_get_sync which
>> never fails
>> c) It then tries to do some operation on the device (such as read the
>> revision register (as part of probe) without clock or adequate OMAP
>> generic PM operation performed for enabling the module.
>>
>> This causes a crash such as that reported in:
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66441
>>
>> When 'ti,hwmod' is provided in dt node, it is expected that the device
>> will not function without the OMAP's power automanagement. Hence, when
>> we hit a fail condition (due to hwmod entries not present or other
>> similar scenario), fail at pm_domain level due to lack of data, provide
>> enough information for it to be fixed, however, it allows for the driver
>> to take appropriate measures to prevent crash.
>
> Kevin, any comments on this one?
Looks like a good approach to catch these corner cases.
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-09 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-04 1:39 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: add fail hook for runtime_pm when bad data is detected Nishanth Menon
2013-12-04 8:08 ` Joel Fernandes
2013-12-04 11:33 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-12-04 12:44 ` Joel Fernandes
2013-12-04 13:37 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-12-05 9:36 ` Joel Fernandes
2013-12-05 19:03 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-12-09 16:06 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2013-12-10 17:30 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-12-10 17:41 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mwka80vu.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).